Subject:
|
Re: the latest news
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:32:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
883 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> [...]
> With that in mind it is very close to '0' - a "worthless, should never have
> been written" rating - the suggestion is useless to the LUGNET admin. But I
> did give it '10', because you do highlight a fear that I think probably does
> exist within the community - hence the clarification :)
FWIW, thanks (Richard) for replying to Scott's message. You nailed it
perfectly.
(I started a reply, but halfway into it I decided it wasn't worth the time
and abandoned it. I wasn't even sure whether Scott's question was serious.)
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) Partly for clarification, and partly because I have a little sypathy for your assertion that it is 'cowardly' to rate low without explanation - I rated your post as '10'. i) Posts aren't 'deleted' from the system. ii) Some posts are cancelled, (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
