| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Tony Priestman writes:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Richard Franks (<Ft9L7z.20u@lugnet.com>) wrote at
> 12:55:11
>
> > Yup - for that group only though. Rating posts in lugnet.lego.direct as how
> > useful they will be to LEGO Direct reaps the most benefit for the LUGNET
> > readership if that means that LD can focus on the best suggestions and
> > thoughts in that group.
>
> And you have absolutely no way of telling what is useful.
Except that we know that they want certain information - like what pieces are
most popular, because they are starting up a bulk-ordering service.
> > Rating lugnet.lego.direct posts on how good an idea they are in general (eg
> > bring back pirates) does not give the most benefit to the LUGNET readership.
>
> Why not? Surely a lot of people saying Pirates are great is a very good
> indicator that a Pirate parts pack might be a good idea, for example.
A Pirates part pack would be a very good idea, but as lugnet.lego.direct
*isn't* talking about releasing parts packs, it's a very useless idea in that
group.
The same suggestion in lugnet.dear-lego, would be both a good idea, and a
useful post for that group.
> Let's not try and do *anybody* else's thinking for them.
If LD say that they want suggestions on part-packs.. or what sets to resurrect,
then you'll see a consequential increase in the scores for such posts.
http://www.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=6
The point of rating messages in lugnet.lego.direct is to help LD by making it
easier to see posts which reflect the agenda that LD have set.
> Sycophancy and elitism are just two of the things I've increasingly
> started to pick up when I dip into admin.general. It's time to
> unsubscribe again :(
If this is true, then it's a problem - do you feel comfortable giving examples?
Maybe if there was a trusted neutral third party who could anonymously voice
the concerns of those who don't feel comfortable speaking up?
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: the latest news
|
| On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Richard Franks (<Ft9L7z.20u@lugnet.com>) wrote at 12:55:11 (...) And you have absolutely no way of telling what is useful. (...) Why not? Surely a lot of people saying Pirates are great is a very good indicator that a Pirate (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
