Subject:
|
Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Apr 2000 05:09:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
971 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> Dan Boger <dan@giccs.georgetown.edu> wrote:
> > well the way I see it (and Todd might prove me wrong) is that this way
> > the client has the freedom to do whatever it wants with the ratings...
> > such as have a separate default rating for each NG, or do some sort of
> > statistical magic with that data - histograms, StdDev, etc...
>
> The downside, as I see it :) is that if the client just gets back one number
> per article somehow, it's an afternoon/evening hack to add this to a
> newsreader (like slrn) which already has GroupLens support. If the client
> has to actually process data streams, it's a Project....
Well, maybe we can do both. Depends on the bandwidth and frequency of calls.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|