Subject:
|
Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Apr 2000 03:31:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDMavoidspam.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
838 times
|
| |
| |
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> old, if someone goes back and rates it. Your client shouldn't have to endure
> (neither should the server) sending a complete copy of the ratings for the
> past 2000 messages -- only the ones which have changed since the last time the
> client asked. Thus, perhaps message number plus timestamp, but not message
> number without timestamp.
Oh! I am thinking of "rating" as the number displayed with a message on the
web site. Are you saying that you'd spit out the entire rating history of
the message, for the client to do something with? Hmmm.....
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|