To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 5969
5968  |  5970
Subject: 
Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 6 Apr 2000 03:31:17 GMT
Reply-To: 
MATTDM@MATTDMavoidspam.ORG
Viewed: 
838 times
  
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
old, if someone goes back and rates it.  Your client shouldn't have to endure
(neither should the server) sending a complete copy of the ratings for the
past 2000 messages -- only the ones which have changed since the last time the
client asked.  Thus, perhaps message number plus timestamp, but not message
number without timestamp.

Oh! I am thinking of "rating" as the number displayed with a message on the
web site. Are you saying that you'd spit out the entire rating history of
the message, for the client to do something with? Hmmm.....



--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
 
(...) I guess the client doesn't really care about the history of the message rating, but that would be the best way to adjust the clients view of messages rating... though I assume the client will be able to query the ratings of a message (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
 
(...) Me too. (What did you think I was thinking about?) (...) Yeh. For streaming clients, so they can update their ratings in an extremely time and bandwidth-efficient way. --Todd (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
 
(...) Timestamp because the server would need to know at what time the client last asked for the ratings. Changes since a given message number isn't sufficient because it provides too little information -- it would end up having to report back more (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  

29 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR