General Discussions about LUGNET : 5979

Administrative / General / 5979

5978 | 5980

Subject:	Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Thu, 6 Apr 2000 04:33:35 GMT
Viewed:	4549 times

Todd Lehman wrote: [snip long good explanation] > So, something like that. Each time an article's rating changes, it needs to > flag that article with the timestamp of the change, and then be able to spit > back that article as part of a list of articles whose ratings have changed > past some specified timestamp. nod, exactly what I meant. I was afraid you meant something like: lugnet.foo.bad:5321 80 lugnet.foo.bad:5321 40 lugnet.foo.bad:5321 70 lugnet.foo.bad:5321 50 lugnet.foo.bad:5321 -80 (a rating of 80 removed) lugnet.foo.bad:5321 20 etc... which leaves the client having to keep the state. btw, do you care if the client doesn't rate in "nice" numbers? Can a client rate an article "87"? Cause even though html doesn't have a slide bar element, a GUI can... :) Dan

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) No, I wouldn't be that cruel! :) :) (...) Absolutely, it can, yes. :) Any integer in the range 0 to 100 inclusive. The histogram display on the website snaps values to the nearest 10-stop. (...) Cool! --Todd (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) Yeah -- what Dan said. I don't mean to send the entire _history_ with all the timestamps, but rather to send the raw data up to that point -- all the raw values -- (which is almost like the whole history) -- so that the client can calculate a (...) (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

29 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact