General Discussions about LUGNET : 5986


Administrative / General / 5986	5985 \| 5987

Subject:	Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Thu, 6 Apr 2000 05:05:47 GMT
Reply-To:	MATTDM@MATTDM.ihatespamORG
Viewed:	885 times

Dan Boger <dan@giccs.georgetown.edu> wrote: > well the way I see it (and Todd might prove me wrong) is that this way > the client has the freedom to do whatever it wants with the ratings... > such as have a separate default rating for each NG, or do some sort of > statistical magic with that data - histograms, StdDev, etc... The downside, as I see it :) is that if the client just gets back one number per article somehow, it's an afternoon/evening hack to add this to a newsreader (like slrn) which already has GroupLens support. If the client has to actually process data streams, it's a Project.... -- Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) Well, maybe we can do both. Depends on the bandwidth and frequency of calls. --Todd (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) I think that's a typo... should be "lugnet.foo.bar:666 40 60 70 70 80" :) (...) well the way I see it (and Todd might prove me wrong) is that this way the client has the freedom to do whatever it wants with the ratings... such as have a (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

29 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search