To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 5984
5983  |  5985
Subject: 
Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 6 Apr 2000 04:53:47 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
775 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
  lugnet.foo.bar 40 60 70 70 80
  lugnet.bar.baz 70
  lugnet.glorp.gnort 80 80 90 90 90 90 90 90 100 100 100

Uh oh; now I'm confused again. I thought articles were rated, not groups.

No, that's correct.  Articles are, groups aren't.  But a client could, if it
wanted to, start messages off with any default number (not necessarily 50)
based on which group(s) the article appears in.


[...]
Maybe I'm missing something (like I said, I'm confused) but it seems like
it'd make sense to calculate the (new) current value whenever a new rating
is submitted, and store that. (I assume that articles will be read at least
an order of magnitude more often than they are rated.)

The server does store the new composite rating (almost) whenever a new rating
is submitted by a human, yes.  I say almost because it actually only stores the
sum and the count, and divides these to get the rating at display-time only.
That's so that the 50 isn't written in stone.

But the composite ratings aren't as useful to clients as the raw values, and

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
 
(...) "Not as useful" doesn't mean "not exactly what Matthew wants". *grin* (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
 
(...) Uh oh; now I'm confused again. I thought articles were rated, not groups. Assuming that the above represent articles ("lugnet.foo.bar" = one post in lugnet.foo?), then the rating shown on the web page would be: lugnet.foo.bar 64 lugnet.bar.baz (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  

29 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR