Subject:
|
Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Apr 2000 04:08:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
815 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Dan Boger <dan@giccs.georgetown.edu> wrote:
> > Another thought though, instead of giving the "rating log" from a
> > timestamp, give us the _full_ rating of messages that changed since a
> > timestamp. It'll make it simpler to deal with things like "UnRate" and
> > will also cut down on the amt of data sent...
> > Thoughts?
>
> All I really want is a number representing the current
> cumulative-to-this-point score -- like what's displayed on the web page.
I think you'll be able to get that from the message headers, when you
look it up... but most cases the message when you read it first will
have a rating of 50 - assuming you get it as soon as it's posted, no one
would have had a chance to rate it yet... that's why you need to be
able to look up ratings after the initial download.
:)
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
