Subject:
|
Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Apr 2000 04:20:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
737 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> > old, if someone goes back and rates it. Your client shouldn't have to
> > endure (neither should the server) sending a complete copy of the ratings
> > for the past 2000 messages -- only the ones which have changed since the
> > last time the client asked. Thus, perhaps message number plus timestamp,
> > but not message number without timestamp.
>
> Oh! I am thinking of "rating" as the number displayed with a message on the
> web site.
Me too. (What did you think I was thinking about?)
> Are you saying that you'd spit out the entire rating history of
> the message, for the client to do something with? Hmmm.....
Yeh. For streaming clients, so they can update their ratings in an extremely
time and bandwidth-efficient way.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
