Subject:
|
Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 22:46:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
749 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> >
> > This was downscored because?
> >
> > - you didn't like my guesses
> > - wrong place for them, might give TLC the wrong idea about what chumps we • are
> > - typed in too quickly so too many typos?
Thanks for your reply. Todd gave a completely accurate response to your
comments which nevertheless didn't actually shed any light on what might have
been done to make my post more useful.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
| (...) If you're talking about... (URL) can only speak for myself (not the other 40-value that's there, and I hope whoever it is feels no pressure to speak up) but IIRC, I gave it a 40 because I was quite confident that the trains would turn out to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
| (...) While I don't think people should need to justify why they mark anything up or down, I think it would help if people were prepared to give/suggest reasons if someone genuinely is curious why they have been downscored. Otherwise they are likely (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
