Subject:
|
Re: Top-N article list adjusted for article-age
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 14:50:04 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
827 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > [...] The elapsed time (article age) will be accounted for later in
> > searches and top-N lists by scaling the score according to some f(t). [...]
>
> Here's a crude example -- a static list built "by hand" from a few one-liners
> using current data:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/?p=hotlight
Interesting.
I would also suggest that it might be interesting to have another list that in
addition to time value, takes the NUMBER of ratings into account.
To my way of thinking 2 articles both rated 90 aren't quite the same if one is
rated 90 by 5 and the other by 50.
Just something to ponder.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Top-N article list adjusted for article-age
|
| (...) [...] (...) I'm with you on this. This is the only real problem with the system as it stands - not enough readers are rating the posts. Scores on post with only one rating are of little value (to me) - especially when the single score is 0 or (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Top-N article list adjusted for article-age
|
| (...) Here's a crude example -- a static list built "by hand" from a few one-liners using current data: (URL) told it to examine all the articles which have been rated so far, and adjust their ratings downward the older the article, according to (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
