Subject:
|
Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 22:11:09 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
760 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> This was downscored because?
>
> - you didn't like my guesses
> - wrong place for them, might give TLC the wrong idea about what chumps we are
> - typed in too quickly so too many typos?
>
> Just curious.
While I don't think people should need to justify why they mark anything up or
down, I think it would help if people were prepared to give/suggest reasons if
someone genuinely is curious why they have been downscored.
Otherwise they are likely to do it again - with feedback, marking can have a
positive effect on the quality of posts.
I have no idea why the guesses were marked down, perhaps it is just random
subjectivity - but that's just a guess :)
Richard
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
| (...) "Marking up" or "marking down" is a figment of the imagination. The initial score of 50 shown by the webserver is simply the result of a single value 50 in the average. If an article is rated 30 by someone, it hasn't been "marked down" to 40 (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
