To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 13480 (-20)
  Re: dot mecha curator request
 
(...) I'm sorry that your membership has been neglected. As was the case with Matt, I was unaware of your poor treatment until you posted here. I've forwarded an alert to Todd (which is what I did for Matt) requesting special attention to your case. (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz wrote: [snip] (...) No. (...) Six years ago there were two full-time administrators. Perhaps that sounds like a cheezy answer, because we naturally prefer to think of moral standards as unaffected by things like (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
 
(...) YEAA!! Thanks for starting this thread. It's exactly the kind of thing I like to see happening right now. Remember too that there's the (URL) LUGNET Suggestions> area where you'll find many valuable ideas and discussions. -Suz (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) Mark, I'm sorry I didn't have time last night to formulate a proper reply to this. I sort of went to bed thinking about how best to explain my view to Frank.. Now I'll reply to his post directly. But here I just want to state that I didn't (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) Thanks Tim, Mark, and Jeff for resolving this. -Suz (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) Yes I should. I've just woken up (in the morning sense, not the metaphorical sense) enough to realise that my continued posting in this subthread is every bit as bad as your starting of it. Unless I see something I really disagree with I will (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) Jeff Stembel summed up my motives for response very well (better than I have so far) in his (URL) response> to Mark so I won't bother trying to explain them again. (...) I'm a bit suspicious as to why we are getting so many admins from BZPower (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) It seemed to me he was trying to show a percieved double standard. While I do disagree with the use of the term "flaming" here in this thread (I consider flaming to be a post in order to denigrate another individual openly and and for no (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) I don't see Mark pursuing 'an agenda' here at all, I see him following up on a perfectly reasonable question that wasn't answered initially. Here are his exact words: "What was done to the people who baited and flamed?" He goes on to say he (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) You know, I had a big reply I was about to post, but that I thought of what (URL) Suz said:> "Know when to drop it. Some people have a difficult time quitting arguments. Either they're afraid of losing face, they insist on having the last (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) I have a question - and it echos (URL) post> that went unanswered/ignored. What was done to the people who baited and flamed? To me thier actions were far worse than Eric's. It seems that the trolls, baiters and flamers got away scott free. (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !! 
 
  Re: dot mecha curator request
 
(...) Look at that! Someone makes a Paypal payment today, and gets his membership right away. I made a Paypal payment on February 11th, and nothing! I guess being vocal in private email isn't good enough. I've got to be vocal in the newsgroups! Nice (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: contacting me via e-mail
 
(...) That's exactly right. (...) Sure, yeah. [nodding] And that's -horrible- if you ask me! Esp with the potential for robotics discussion coming up with the release of the NXT sets. I'm going to open a ticket with Pair Networks' support staff (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Emails not being answered
 
(...) Thank you for your reply Suzanne. Please understand I'm not looking for a refund. I'm looking to become a member! (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: (><)
 
(...) If you need to vent, please do so. It's better than holding it in. Venting isn't immature, unless it's whining, which really isn't venting anyway (and I don't see you doing that). If not one of the off-topic groups, perhaps one of the .people (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: contacting me via e-mail
 
(...) LUGNET email generally seems to have been broken for a while, including the method to validate messages via email: (URL) 1 March 2006 (URL) 17 Feb 2006 (URL) 30 Jan 2006 so maybe some of those 900,000 are connected with that. I also wonder if (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: (><)
 
"Tim Gould" <t.gould(AT@)lancast...c(DOT.)uk> wrote in message news:IxCHy8.r5I@lugnet.com... (...) I feel that it may not be enough for some people. Perhaps there should be a few extra newsgroups like the following: .off-topic.copyright.abuse and (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: (><)
 
(...) Perhaps lugnet needs an .off-topic.rant for these situations (quasi-serious suggestion). Debate is meant to be debates but it might be nice to have somewhere to just yell in. Tim (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
 
(...) Not yet. I don't want to anticipate anything as long as Suz and Todd are still preparing for the change; but all administrative positions are still vacant (from my side). (...) Pestering me isn't that easy, it takes a fair bit to actually (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  (><)
 
AAArrrrggghhh!! I need to vent, but I can't do it here because I'm supposed to act more grown-up than that. [ripping hair out] God help me.... [leaving the room] (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR