Subject:
|
Re: A tiresome tirade (Was: garbage output)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 08:33:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1025 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd:
[...]
> However, if one of the group's "elders" -- say, Terry or Jacob -- were to
That feels just like when kids refer to me as "the man". ;-(
> take the lead and put forth such a suggestion in a formal way, it would be
> my duty to support whatever decision the group made (as long as it was
> arrived at fairly).
I must admit that I haven't (cared to?) read all JW's posts
on Lugnet, but from the ones I have read it appears that he
has a different attitude to LDraw parts development than
most of us.
I don't think he as broken any Lugnet rules - and L-CAD
never had any formalised rules, so I feel it would be best
if we could manage this without revoking JW's posting
privileges.
Could we request JW to discuss the quality of his parts in
private with a "mentor" before they are posted on Lugnet? I
am willing to take on that job for a month. If I don't see
significant improvement in that time I will suggest that we
decide to ignore his LDraw experiments collectively. This
could be done by revoking JW's posting privileges to some or
all of the lugnet.cad hierarchy, but I prefer the "kill file
approach".
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/JJ_Memorial/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A tiresome tirade (Was: garbage output)
|
| (...) Good point -- Very Good point. Yet -- is it intimidating to the uninformed because of a lack of context in the flames? -- (too much tacit knowledge?) -- or just because of any kind of flamage is mean and intimidating? One thing (maybe) worth (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
