Subject:
|
RTL differences
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Apr 1999 18:36:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
608 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, carbon60@bigfoot.com (Carbon 60) writes:
> Mike Stanley wrote:
> > I have to admit that, for the most part, RTL is a dead issue for me.
>
> [...] I really like my local group. The problem is that RTL will slowly
> die if more change over to LUGNET - the only reason I got attached to
> RTl was because of the community spirit of the group - I haven't found
> another group like it.
What do/did you like better about RTL than your local group, since you like
both? Can you compare and contrast them?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: RTL differences
|
| (...) Compare and constrast :-) Classic GCSE English question. Well, I wouldn't compare them - they are 2 different groups for different uses. RTL was really good when I joined in Feb 98 now it's 50% For-Sale posts and discussions about where and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A tiresome tirade (Was: garbage output)
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) However, (...) Yes that's it (more to that question later). (...) Agreed. Perhaps I underestimate the amount of patience that he has tried over the months. Though still, as patient as we have been, flames (in (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
