 | | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) I think Terry's request is valid, Larry. Unless we've overlooked it somewhere (if so, please point it out), no statement has been provided to the LUGNET Membership explaining the decision-making rationale used for the newly created newsgroups. (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) See the charters of the newly created groups. Or review the discussion that has went on here. Or in particular, review Todd's posts, the same ones you commended me to take a look at. I'm not sure it's productive to produce a summary purely for (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) You're right, I haven't read the whole thread, as it is far too long and i worked 60 hours this week, so I was kind of busy and out of it for a few days. Since you are part of the decision-making progress, I'd like for an explanation on why (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Some facts about current events and a small opinion
|
|
(...) Precisely the reason why in my opinion this lgbt newsgroup doesn't belong here. (...) Agreed. (...) That's what I intend to do. I am not scared or offended, mind you. I personnally have had gay and lesbian friends and I do not pretend I will (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) Um, I was part of the decision making process, Terry, so telling me to check with Todd is perhaps a symptom that you haven't been paying close attention to the discussion on this topic or others relating to LUGNET operations. My comments are (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) I think the pol is more than relevant since the main topic of discussion here, these days, are non-Lego related.. As for being likely to be divisive, please check with Todd's decision to make such a newsgroup. To my knowledge, the decision is (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) You left out several responses... The usual one that every poll should have... - This poll is flawed in some way and therefore the answers should not be taken as guidance plus two more... - This poll is inappropriate and likely to be divisive (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Some facts about current events and a small opinion
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Hendrix wrote: [snip] (...) Maybe, instead of making polls, you should take the time to learn about homosexuality. As far as I see, you don't have a clue what it's all about. I'd really wish people would stop referring (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
Please vote! (URL) - Lugnet.admin.general (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Some facts about current events and a small opinion
|
|
Based on www.dictionary.com - here are definitions to some words that have come up in current discussions. I place them here so people will understand the black and white facts as given to us by references we (all?) trust. Gay - (URL) Of, relating (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz wrote: (snip) (...) Being gay presents a special problem, because their behavior is repulsive to heterosexuals. I don't mean to offend gays, but it is the truth. And it goes beyond mere intolerance. We are (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) What's the hurry? I'm still not done making fun of you for being Canadian! Dave! (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) 'Marginalizing' someone's viewpoint with wit and banter? Yeah that doesn't happen in any other group-- Hey Anthony, read any good things from Toronto lately? ;) Lets see what happens when I mention that I love Star Trek, Bab 5, and LEGO all in (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz-lists@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:I471EM.1IKr@lugnet.com... (...) any (...) can't (...) to (...) to (...) laws (...) You have a good point, but I would find it strange if you told me that you were married, and the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
"Jocke" <terje029SPAMBLOCK@xpress.se> wrote in message news:I46zpy.17xn@lugnet.com... (...) One thing I'm of a mind to point out is that this sort of marginalizing is perhaps just why a group might be necessary. I'm trying hard to think of any of (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) Yep, pretty much swing both ways when it comes to my particular hobby. Dave K (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What Does Geobra Society have to do with Lavender Brick Society?
|
|
(...) I thought with all this recent talk about add'l ng's that Dave S would have piped up for a more bon-a-fide MegaBlok NG, instead of 'clone-brands'. But again the L in LUGNET doesn't stand for Lavender or cLone bricks, it stands for LEGO. I (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
"Anders Isaksson" <isaksson.etuna@REMO...telia.com> wrote in message news:I45Jn5.1Cnr@lugnet.com... (...) I´m in luck then, becuase I am "dual handed" =) /J (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) A .left-handed group would be gauche! :-) JOHN (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What Does Geobra Society have to do with Lavender Brick Society?
|
|
(...) More proper? Yes. As to his comments-- he is expressing a uniquely German satirical/sardonic twist to the discussion, which I think reveals his thoughts about the matter in a fun and clever way. Did you catch his "new" sig fig? Good humor:-) (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
