Subject:
|
Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:23:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
249 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Terry Prosper wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > > Please vote!
> > >
> > > http://members.lugnet.com/polls/ballots/?n=174
> > >
> > > FUT - Lugnet.admin.general
> >
> > You left out several responses...
> >
> > The usual one that every poll should have...
> >
> > - This poll is flawed in some way and therefore the answers should not be taken
> > as guidance
> >
> > plus two more...
> >
> > - This poll is inappropriate and likely to be divisive
> > - This poll is not relevant to LUGNET operations as the decision has already
> > been taken and the experiment should be allowed to run its course.
>
> I think the pol is more than relevant since the main topic of discussion here,
> these days, are non-Lego related..
>
> As for being likely to be divisive, please check with Todd's decision to make
> such a newsgroup. To my knowledge, the decision is more likely to be more
> divisive than this poll.
Um, I was part of the decision making process, Terry, so telling me to check
with Todd is perhaps a symptom that you haven't been paying close attention to
the discussion on this topic or others relating to LUGNET operations.
My comments are about the poll... that the poll is lacking choices, not that I
personally would choose those choices. If you want to know my personal feelings
about this, you can find them elsewhere in recent threads. You should not infer
them from the fact that I point out that this poll has issues.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) You're right, I haven't read the whole thread, as it is far too long and i worked 60 hours this week, so I was kind of busy and out of it for a few days. Since you are part of the decision-making progress, I'd like for an explanation on why (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) I think the pol is more than relevant since the main topic of discussion here, these days, are non-Lego related.. As for being likely to be divisive, please check with Todd's decision to make such a newsgroup. To my knowledge, the decision is (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
