Subject:
|
Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:33:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
264 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Terry Prosper wrote:
> Since you are part of the decision-making progress, I'd like for an explanation
> on why such a newsgroup is even remotedly relevant here.
See the charters of the newly created groups. Or review the discussion that has
went on here. Or in particular, review Todd's posts, the same ones you commended
me to take a look at.
I'm not sure it's productive to produce a summary purely for your benefit, just
because you worked almost as many hours last week as I did.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) I think Terry's request is valid, Larry. Unless we've overlooked it somewhere (if so, please point it out), no statement has been provided to the LUGNET Membership explaining the decision-making rationale used for the newly created newsgroups. (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) You're right, I haven't read the whole thread, as it is far too long and i worked 60 hours this week, so I was kind of busy and out of it for a few days. Since you are part of the decision-making progress, I'd like for an explanation on why (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
