Subject:
|
Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:29:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
270 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Um, I was part of the decision making process, Terry, so telling me to check
> with Todd is perhaps a symptom that you haven't been paying close attention to
> the discussion on this topic or others relating to LUGNET operations.
>
> My comments are about the poll... that the poll is lacking choices, not that I
> personally would choose those choices. If you want to know my personal feelings
> about this, you can find them elsewhere in recent threads. You should not infer
> them from the fact that I point out that this poll has issues.
You're right, I haven't read the whole thread, as it is far too long and i
worked 60 hours this week, so I was kind of busy and out of it for a few days.
Since you are part of the decision-making progress, I'd like for an explanation
on why such a newsgroup is even remotedly relevant here.
Terry
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) See the charters of the newly created groups. Or review the discussion that has went on here. Or in particular, review Todd's posts, the same ones you commended me to take a look at. I'm not sure it's productive to produce a summary purely for (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) Um, I was part of the decision making process, Terry, so telling me to check with Todd is perhaps a symptom that you haven't been paying close attention to the discussion on this topic or others relating to LUGNET operations. My comments are (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
