 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) I'd say being left-handed has a greater significance for your Lego building... (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | What Does Geobra Society have to do with Lavender Brick Society?
|
|
Like my subject line says "What does Geobra Society have to do with Lavender Brick Society?" The author of the Geobra post completely removed all words posted in the original Lavender Brick one. No comments are made for/against a GLBT newsgroup but (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) Ummmm, Chris, the 'you dont get it because no one thinks you're weird' line of logic, doesn't fly with me because my sexuality never enters the picture when I am thinking about Lego. I have never tied my sexuality into hobbies. There is no (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Next NYCLUG Meeting -- Saturday, October 2nd
|
|
(...) Hey Dave -- we're cool. Sorry about the little blowup on my part. Were you at the build event in Enfield last month, where we built those bugs? We may have even met. ;-) Looking forward to doing something with NELUG soon -- maybe after the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) Though I agree in concept to what Tim is saying -- that LEGO brings people from different backgrounds together -- the reality is the LEGO community is fragmented. Precedent has already been set... we group discussions about space here, train (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:I451p6.234v@lugnet.com... (...) gotten (...) Is there any difference in beeing interested in Lego depending on your sexual orientation? How about a subgroup for communists, I bet they (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) ... (...) I've hesitated inserting my own comments (other than expressing agreement) on this subject until now -- but this is a question I feel comfortable answering. I believe my experience would be hurt by the addition of any or all of the (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) I think the counterargument to this is that _all_ the subgroups are for heterosexuals because we're in the majority. And the reason that you've gotten along just fine is that no one thinks you're weird (er...queer). (...) Could you possibly (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
(...) Yep I agree. Possibly put a link in the header of .events too. ROSCO (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
(...) Depends on the size/scope, I guess. A gray area. I suppose to answer the question at hand: the .announce group wasn't really intended to be used to announce small, local get-togethers. (...) I think reports (especially with photos, which may (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Next NYCLUG Meeting -- Saturday, October 2nd
|
|
(...) Wow, I hope you didn't take genuine offense at that. My apologies if so. I seriously wan't trying to be sarcastic or anything-- I'm not really even that annoyed that you asked that it be highlighted. I just wanted to point out that (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
(...) Both MichLUG and CLB meetings are open to the public. At the (URL) last CLB meeting>, a lady and her son (who build together) showed up to the meeting because of the notice making it to the Top Stories box. At the (URL) last MichLUG meeting>, (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
(...) In my, personal opinion, Club meetings - which are more or less "Members only" - doesn't belong, while a display/show open to the public is spot on. (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
(...) Would it be possible to get an offical ruling on wether club meeting/show announcements are proper for the main .announce group? Are meeting/show reports/pictures proper for the main .announce group? Also, is there a group that should already (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
(...) I second that emotion. :-) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
Jason Spears wrote in message ... (...) I think that's an excellent idea. Kevin ---...--- Farmhouse kit: (URL) TOWN PLANNING information: (URL) Lego parts store: (URL) Guild of Bricksmiths(TM): (URL) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Next NYCLUG Meeting -- Saturday, October 2nd
|
|
(...) Um, is the sarcasm really necessary? I have now figured out that LUGNET's "organizations" group is the way to go for these announcements. Sorry that we appeared to have, um, bothered you so much. David: I guess you have no problem with anyone (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
(...) I've been guilty of posting local group meeting announcements in the .announce group. Taking another look at the (URL), I guess I could agree that club meeting announcements don't belong. Would you be inclined to say that a club display/show (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) It isn't. By the same token it isn't *NECESSARY* to discuss religion and how it relates to LEGO, but that occurs pretty much every time Rev Brendan posts an update. I would welcome posts from LGBT AFOLs about their MOCs etc. That said, I see (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) There's some irony in here that I thought Richard would have gotten the first time around. -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
