To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 11873
11872  |  11874
Subject: 
Re: Lavender Brick Society
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:31:54 GMT
Viewed: 
1154 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Gregory wrote:

There's never been a subgroup for heterosexuals, and I've gotten
along just fine.

I think the counterargument to this is that _all_ the subgroups are for
heterosexuals because we're in the majority.  And the reason that you've gotten
along just fine is that no one thinks you're weird (er...queer).

If LUGNET decides to make a subgroup for gay members, then others will start
asking for more subgroups for every single type of person who's out there
(Catholics, midgets, retired people, Mexicans, blondes, etc, etc, etc...).

Could you possibly support this assertion?  I mean, it's so obviously false that
it's hard to believe that _you_ believe it.  Do you?  And finally, how would
your LUGNET experience be hurt by forming any or all of these groups?

Chris



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) ... (...) I've hesitated inserting my own comments (other than expressing agreement) on this subject until now -- but this is a question I feel comfortable answering. I believe my experience would be hurt by the addition of any or all of the (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general) ! 
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:I451p6.234v@lugnet.com... (...) gotten (...) Is there any difference in beeing interested in Lego depending on your sexual orientation? How about a subgroup for communists, I bet they (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Ummmm, Chris, the 'you dont get it because no one thinks you're weird' line of logic, doesn't fly with me because my sexuality never enters the picture when I am thinking about Lego. I have never tied my sexuality into hobbies. There is no (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)

106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR