 | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Yes indeed. We all have a right and a responsibility to work to make LUGNET a better place. Lead, follow, or get out of the way. (...) Yes and here, I think, is a perfect example of this: (URL) line, the guidance is in with a lot of other info (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | (...) This sentiment is not friendly. It is arrogant and has a stink of martiality. It really bugs me, I'm sorry to say. I am unlikely to do any of the above. (...) There has been insufficient restraint so far in the cause of 'correction'. The (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) It may be bluntly stated, but frankly, if you are not here to work with all the members and users of Lugnet to make Lugnet a better place, I think you are in the wrong place. Take a look at the Lugnet plan for some of Todd's and Suzanne's (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | I was going to reply to Kyle directly, but Frank, you gave me a better springboard. :-) "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3C4E370A.6D598D...ing.com... (...) LUGNET (...) of (...) Exactly, I agree. The sentiment 'lets make (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | (...) An interesting description. I challenge you to look at all my posts over the last couple of months outside this group and look at the amount of “thorning” I have generated. Compare that to your own, and that of your vigilante mate’s. I know I (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hi Scott, Please refrain from quoting the entire post to reply to a single paragraph. If people want more context, they can always read the previous posts. Thanks ROSCO (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) But does blunt arrogance make Lugnet a better place? (...) No one is saying that. Where Larry was wrong was to ask for respect, when he was failing to do so for others – respect is a two way street. It was 1st rate hypocrisy. Nothing less. It (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | (...) No. But I have to give credit at least for an effort. I give more credence and respect to those who contribute but I view an effort as noteworthy none-the-less. (...) I didn't see anything disrespectful in the way that Larry made his (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) Now *you* are missing the point. (...) I would say it is both. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess writes: <Snip> (...) Wow, that cleaned up pretty good! Let's cut to the end of the tape... Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) is not a good thing. I'll tell you why: First thing-no names please--whatever (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | Hmm, I was trying to get myself out of this discussion... I for the most part would like to see the same picture David espouses. The problem that I see is that when people make these little "nudges", the "offender" takes offense and yells "why are (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | | | David Koudys wrote in message ... (...) of (...) all (...) Disclaimer: I am not in any way an admin, just a concerned community member. Anyone who posts on LUGNET agreed to the TOS when they signed up. From the TOS ((URL) not) Post or transmit any (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | "David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:GqIEps.3H6@lugnet.com... (...) over. If that's what you think of the people (including myself) who are doing the policing, you don't know us well enough. I certainly don't scour LUGNET (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Me either. As I said in my first email to David (perhaps using a not very good analogy didn't make that point very clear, admittedly). (...) Me too, me either. (...) I did but it didn't address that point. I may have been unclear but as I said (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I understand that each subcommunity is different. I'm not for strict adherence to the exact same set-in-stone standards for every obscure group on LUGNET. At the same time, each group should be mature and good-natured enough to practice (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | | (...) I can't think of a single currently active participant who remotely seems to go out of his or her way to police newsgroups. And the only person I can think of at all who may have had the appearance of policing was just trying to be helpful. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) If I called up someone on the phone and said, "Hey friend, I think that was a little over-the-top" I don't think you would know. If we, at one of our monthly meetings brought up the faux pas that was posted in the newsgroup--again, I don't (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) You are correct. Analogous to another relatively recent admin.general discussion, if you don't reply publicly to the effect, no one knows you did what you did, and we are left to assume that the issue is left unchecked. If you want to admonish (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Frank did an excellent job of addressing most of the points you raised in your post. There was one loose end though... In lugnet.admin.general, Kyle Beatty wrote much that Larry snipped: (...) I am assuming this example is what you refer to here in (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
