 | | Re: Let There Be Post
|
|
(...) ..... and PaB. Nice long list from Palisades to come as soon as I'm sure we're in the clear. Dawn (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let There Be Post
|
|
And there was Post. And the Admin saw it, and said, "This is pleasing to us." And the Host of Users rejoiced. Yea, verily. (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let There Be Post
|
|
... and Schleim too. (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Let There Be Post
|
|
Looks like it is happy. (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Hear hear! I'll speak the same for myself (and as much as I have the power to do so, the same for the LEGO MindStorms Forums). LEGO is such a community-focused product that I think it's the least I can do to offer my help if it's wanted. Just (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Very nice! My only complaint is that all the black is gone, leaving the page with too much white space. But everything else is great. Marc Nelson Jr. (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Well I know that there are some goof balls who take the time to use MichLUG.org's contact form to spam us MichLUGers. So if someone is willing to waste their time on that I can only assume the same would be true of a much larger site like (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Good Man! This is great news Todd. (...) Great team! May I suggest you should consider asking one or two international representatives as well (unless Kelly is, because she (he?) apparently isn't a Lugnet member and I have never met them)? I'm (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Orion, do you have any basis for making a blanket statement such as your first sentence? I'm not trying to defend or condemn anybody, but that's bad logic to just say "trust me.." and not give any reason. Your next sentence provides a reason, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) I've been thinking about this for a while myself. It's a great way to stimulate both creativity and lateral thinking! May I suggest "Tricky Bricks Incorporated" and propose the small rubber band holder as the first contender: (URL) should be (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
Todd, et al: Here is a quick and dirty idea for a new home page. I cobbled it together in photoshop. It is relativly unpopulated and it not very space-optimized. But I hope you get the idea: (URL) idea is the left column is Lugnet-specific stuff, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) I'd rather see the link directory be well architected than reflect majority opinion. This would require a few thoughtful, knowledgeable, and fair people to give a little bit of time to maintaining it. This isn't voting on major policy here, we (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) In the clear cases, there is no argue that they could get as good results as few admins. In the 'grey' cases, the voting of more people can make the result to represent the majority opinion, which may not be the case of few admins. (...) It (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: fun with LUGNET web site statistics
|
|
Thanks for posting these. Although I have absolutely no use for them I find statistics facinating. I had a brief look at the Korean pages you mentioned, all seem very professional but of course completely unintelligable (even with the Korean fonts (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Our company decided that all of the webhosters are too restrictive, so we went the serverhosting way, where man can have lots of freedom without any additional payments. RH Enterprise + 700gbs of traffic monthly for relatively low price. I can (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) From a technical point of view, nothing at all. And maybe Pair would be cool about it, I dunno. ISPs like to charge for stuff like that, is all. Hopefully, we'll eventually have an arrangement which gives us more control. (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) ? I'm for moderation. But _everybody_ would be one. You'd vote for 'offtopic', I'd vote for 'offtopic', somebody else would do so... and voila, link is removed. The only problem remains in setting the good rules with good weights. (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Why frame this negatively with the words 'power centralization?' Think ... what 'power' would link administrators have? Approve/reject links to be made public. Its in the best interest of creating a comprehensive directory to link to as many (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) "If we just ignore the spammers, they'll stop sending Email" Trust me, the above statement is completly false. I think moderation is neccessary to avoid the link page from being overrun with ads for "free" medication and "foolproof" get rich (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Hi, I think I proposed the very same thing in my previous post from 'Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:41:56 GMT' in this thread too. (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Sorry, this doesn't sound too 'open' to me as I fell this is 'power centralisation' (your opinions may differ, of course). I still think that crowd may have 'better' {and definitely faster} decisions than few chosen ones. I think that total (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) I don't know anything about current situation, but this is beyond my imagination? What's that 'expensive' on one dns record and one mod_rewrite line in Apache config? (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Sorry about my repitiveness but heres the pictures again because they havent worked Heres my Idea! I know it doesnt look much different -- Jeff The small “MY LUGNET” lego smiley referrs to this post (2 URLs) this is my second idea (URL) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) I tried to come up with a few simplified & fun designs for pages, my fave being this (within this thread, but linked so you don't have to wade thru posts again): (URL) one of the great suggestions i got was that the images may be a (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Man am I behind in my reading/posting. The Spacers have a Seed Part of the Month... it seems to generate some (a LOT OF!) neat creations. Not all seed parts are "cool", IIRC, some were chosen to be "challenging" to incorporate, so maybe it's a (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) You designs are good but the problem I have with them is color, too much of it to be specific. Notice how LUGNET's current main page is all one color theme with localized centers of other colors. This, to me, is more pleasing to the eye than (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) I agree. -Tim (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: fun with LUGNET web site statistics
|
|
(...) Depending on the software you use, I guess - I think that webalizer allows you to specify what _isn't_ a page :) (...) Always fun :) Here are the stats from end of March 2003 to the end of January 2004. Average hits (that's images, pages, (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) I think it'd be good if people's ideas use (URL) as a base. (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: fun with LUGNET web site statistics
|
|
(...) It's hard on Lugnet, since pages aren't all handily suffixed with .html. But I think it's around 18.4% -- the majority is definitely graphics. (...) I'd be curious to see the ones for peeron, if only because I'm in a web server stats geek mode (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: fun with LUGNET web site statistics
|
|
(...) heh :) Though, I believe since around the time that LDraw.org moved to be hosted on Peeron's server, we stopped using partref's pictures, and started using LDraws - any referrer's from us to LUGNET after, say, April 2003 or so are either (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
In lugnet.announce, Todd Lehman wrote: much great stuff snipped Todd- I think this is fantastic! It's great to see your enthusiasm and the great new ideas! Please let us know where, how and if we can be of any help. We'd love to work closely with (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: fun with LUGNET web site statistics
|
|
(...) All very interesting statistics! Thanks for crunching the data. I have always thought that Lugnet should allow Google (and perhaps other search engines) to crawl the posts on Lugnet. Even though the data would perhaps be a few weeks old, I (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | fun with LUGNET web site statistics
|
|
Today, I got the 2GB of compressed log files representing Lugnet traffic over the past approximately-a-year. After crunching for a while, realizing that I needed to move everything to a faster server, and restarting there, I discovered that what I (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Although, see the post I'm just about to make. (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Thank you for your constructive criticism last week, Troy. It made a difference. --Todd (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Well, from my point of view, it is broke... But it's very fixable. (...) I feel that way as well. (...) Thanks...although I certainly can't claim sole credit for that. (...) I'm not super-familiar with the LDraw.org system lately, but maybe (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Great news all-around Todd! I am glad to be wrong about change not coming to Lugnet! I look forward to seeing what you and your advisory Committee come up with. If we at Classic-Castle.com can help in any way, do not hesitate to ask. Troy (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Landspeeder Difference
|
|
(...) Same thing goes for the new x-wing, the new Millenium Falcon, the new speeder bikes, the new snowspeeder, etc. I think the builders at LEGO thought they could do better than the first versions they made a couple of years back. In my opinion, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
How about a page that we create ourselves out of options that are kept ion a cookie? Let me explain. The first time you come to Lugnet, you get a general page welcoming you and with a clear menu to personnalize the front page. When you go to the (...) (21 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
