 | | The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
Hello everybody, In an earlier post in this thread I stated that I would start to make a list containing the various names for each LEGO part. As many parts have different names in different auctions, programms and inventories it is sometimes hard (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) lists (...) lot (...) Two other resources come to mind: Lutz Uhlmann's Parts Reference at: (URL) reference of technic parts at: (URL) of these cover lots of parts not done in LDraw, and the Technica pages even have images of parts not LDrawn. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
[Followup-To set to lugnet.admin.database -- can we please corral this (important) discussion to one location? It's getting cross-posted to too many ng's] (...) I've got some LDraw-to-AucZILLA cross-reference information. Let me dig it out... (...) (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) (I should have done that, discussion can be at one place) (...) That would be great (...) That is a good idea. The information I have till thus far still has included the name where it was used, so that might be possible. However, I still (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
John Van Zwieten wrote (...) Both great pages, I still ahve to add them, which is some work with the Technica page because the names of the parts are only in the pictures. I have to check if the parts on Lutz Uhlmann's page, that are also LDrawn (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) Oops -- I think there has been a major misunderstanding; that's not what I meant at all. When I wrote: TSL> As they say in Canada, Minnesota, and Maine, "O-ya, it's been parta da TSL> plan since day one." :-) Lots of little prototypes and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
This seems like it is reaching critical mass (a good thing) and perhaps at this point a dedicated newsgroup should be created for this (i.e., efforts to standardize parts nomenclature). How does lugnet.db.brictionary sound? I wouldn't quite put it (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
(...) Sounds good. Right place in the hierarchy. (...) And it's not actually part names, but a parts identification database, right? Having standard/prefered names is good, but it's the pictures (and maybe schematics) that actually identify the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) Great. I'd love to contribute to the Lugnet Bricktionary in any way possible. Of course, I'd love to contribute to just about any effort to establish a public db for part identification and reference. Steve (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
(...) Steve, I totally agree what is needed is a complete classification/taxonomy system so you can find a part. The naming component is useful and interesting but this project should be a parts database not just a name database. If the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
(...) Right. Identification and reference and browsing and all that. Massively cross-referenced within itself and to/from set inventories, MOC's, and the marketplace. So it's really a sub-database of the larger database. The "Brictionary" part is (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
Hehe, I found you! 8-) /Tore (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lepanadat project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) Yes, there was a misunderstanding. I thought that you mentioned the name for this project, which you appearently did not. My goal has been changed slightly, from a name database to a searchable database with the different names that are used (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
(...) I actually had something to say in reply to Jim's message, but I posted it incorrectly once (defaulted the Newsgroup field), so I canceled and reposted, but didn't paste in the earlier text. Oh, well. Steve (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lepanadat project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
In lugnet.db.brictionary, Sybrand Bonsma writes: <snip> (...) slightly, (...) are (...) How about a Lego piecesaurus or bricksaurus? Just a thought. Maybe not a good one either. -Tom McD. when replying, be sure to tune for the TV special on the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lepanadat project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
Tom? Tom? Oh *there* you are. Now come here this instant! I'm sorry guys. Sometimes Tom gets out of his yard (.pun) and wanders through the neighboring NGs-- he's harmless really. Come on, Tom: Now! Ever since that nasty business in .qotd a while (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lepanadat project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) Is that your evil twin brother? :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 10-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lepanadat project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) Well, I don't know what Tom looks like, but if he is devilishly handsome, yes;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lepanadat project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) business in (...) Dang. I stay away for one whole day and the brown bricks hit the fan! (...) all...please (...) Hey, IMO, why pick a strange acronym when a pun will do better? (...) Yeah, kinda like Capt. Kirk's evil twin: "Where's the (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lepanadat project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) Actually I look like a cross between Dan Akroyd and Peter Brady. So you could say that, yeah.. you could.. -Tom McD. when replying, Faraday's rule #23: spamcake brings trouble. (25 years ago, 11-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lepanadat project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) For the moment I will keep the name Lepanadat, otherwise I have to change to change the name in some files again. Also I think there isn't that much people that visit the site at the moment, so the actual name still isn't important. As soon as (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
What's this all about? You guys playing hide and seek in here? Adam Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3786467b.729193...net.com... (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Bricktionary
|
|
(...) How about a "known alias" category as well? Maybe include a warning category for the the piece has been mistaken for? The effort doesn't have to be strictly technical. I've submitted a couple sets to the database, and I've been at a loss over (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Picture references
|
|
(...) Not to overwhelm kl.net, but if a piece can be indentified in an old manual that has been scanned maybe a DB field could mention that. Doesn't have to be a direct link, but it might be a good common reference point. Mark (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bricktionary
|
|
(...) Shows me what happens with stale followup-to's... (...) Interesting ideas. Could be useful, especially for parts with no simple description. (...) Steve (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
