 | | Re: A database question
|
|
(...) But writing a function is MUCH more flexible than the built-in export facility. PLUS you can write it such that you do not have to do anything but press a button to get this file generated, MUCH nicer, IMHO (or perhaps I'm just biased because (...) (26 years ago, 7-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Updatezilla
|
|
(...) I thought hork meant to toss your cookies? :) From Tom McDonald Anti-spam block in place. (URL) what you can, but behave yourself. We'll have more, right after this. (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
(...) That sounds about right. (I'm on trial for this, right?) September-October 1995 was when those discussions were going on that resulted in the FLG being created... At least I listed to Joshua/wisdom and used "series" instead of "sub-theme." :) (...) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
(...) I dunno. This comment looks like it took place sometime around Sept. '95, and Deja News finds references to "sub-theme" and "subtheme" as far back as April '95 -- and Deja News doesn't go back much further than that. So I don't think Todd's to (...) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
(...) 'Subtheme' was a term you suggested back in the days when Fibblesnork was more of a living entity, and you suggested that some terminology be laid out. It's the one that took off after that discussion. I don't think it was so much a case of "I (...) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
(...) Eh, whenever did I invent that term? And what have I done to popularize it? The weird term I made up for the FLG was "series." I don't like subtheme either, unless there is also the concept of supertheme -- as in subcategory and supercategory. (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
(...) In case accuracy WRT TLG is important here, the actual hierarchy looks like the following (I may never forgive Todd for his invention of the term "subtheme" :-P) Product Programme +- Product Line +- Product Theme "Race" is a theme in the "Town (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
First off, let me state that were I designing this from scratch I'd do an object model not a data model but... (...) You need a hierarchy table. Model it like this (not legit SQL) Table Theme ThemeID integer PRIMARY KEY NOT NIL ThemeType Code /* (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
Larry: Thanks for your comments, this is exactly the type of discussion I hoped posting this would generate: (...) Yes. (...) It is. I am still trying to figure out how to put themes and subthemes into a table. (...) This makes alot more sense than (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
Jim Hughes wrote: Disclaimer: I am not a DBA but I do know enough SQL to be dangerous. Interesting. I comment on this as if it were a logical DB design. Do you have a downloadable schema (for erwin or whatever?) Some comments: Is recno designed to (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | A Technic set DB outline
|
|
Hi: First, thanks for everyone's help with my earlier database question. Here is a new one: does anyone have a Lego database in a true relational format (with all of the normalization, etc)? I have come up with an outline that will hold all of the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Three Suggestions
|
|
(...) Right, that's why the :) -- it seemed like an obviously good idea at first, but then I couldn't really think of many practical uses. (26 years ago, 29-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Three Suggestions
|
|
(...) Is that a real :) or mostly a ;) ? I agree that a PerlRE would be cool (and not really difficult to add), but can you give some concrete examples of search queries which would benefit in a major way from a feature like that? I can see a bit of (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Three Suggestions
|
|
(...) How about this?... (URL) least for the time being... --Todd (26 years ago, 29-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Updatezilla
|
|
What I tell people when they ask is that I can't give or revoke permission to use the images on my site because I don't own them in the first place. I agree it's a nettequette issue rather than a legal one. KL (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Updatezilla
|
|
(...) It still never hurts to ask, although Huw (and I think Kevin) have given "blanket" permission for use of the images in this context. I don't recall if Tore, Joe, and Jim have given such blanket permissions, so I would ask. Aside from explicit (...) (26 years ago, 27-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Updatezilla
|
|
Hi all Todd, now I've 521 set pictures that are not registered to the database yet, and 202 other pictures for the sets with missing pictures. I'm still waiting further info from you. By the way, I investigated a little bit the pictures in my hand (...) (26 years ago, 27-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A database question
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <365c1013.5669348@lu...et.com>... (...) Access provides this facility built-in so there's no overhead in keeping it in Access, then creating a query to export the table(s)/fields exactly as required. Huw (26 years ago, 26-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A database question
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote: < DBA 101, topic: non unique "keys" which really aren't keys.> Yup. AutoNum means no manual thinking about which postfix to attach to the set (and attendent opportunity for error) but also means a number that has no human meaning, (...) (26 years ago, 25-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A database question
|
|
(...) If you go with Access, take the time to write a VBA function to export the data to CSV format. That way, you can share with everyone, and you won't have a export-headache each time you update the database. (...) The classic relational database (...) (26 years ago, 25-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
