Subject:
|
Re: A database question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Nov 1998 17:19:45 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.^SayNoToSpam^iwantnospam.com
|
Viewed:
|
526 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
< DBA 101, topic: non unique "keys" which really aren't keys.>
Yup. AutoNum means no manual thinking about which postfix to attach to
the set (and attendent opportunity for error) but also means a number
that has no human meaning, making debugging marginally harder.
> > Is there a better way?
>
> I've always liked the idea of letting Todd do it. <gdr>
It certainly seems to be the most elegant solution... but may not be the
most timely. Todd's Master Plan (tm) is not public at the task level,
and is not directly changable, only influencible, by outside forces.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A database question
|
| (...) If you go with Access, take the time to write a VBA function to export the data to CSV format. That way, you can share with everyone, and you won't have a export-headache each time you update the database. (...) The classic relational database (...) (26 years ago, 25-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
