Subject:
|
Re: A database question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Nov 1998 13:05:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
862 times
|
| |
| |
Steve Bliss wrote in message <365c1013.5669348@lugnet.com>...
> Once upon a time, "Jim Hughes" <hughesj@one.net> wrote:
>
> If you go with Access, take the time to write a VBA function to export
> the data to CSV format. That way, you can share with everyone, and
> you won't have a export-headache each time you update the database.
Access provides this facility built-in so there's no overhead in keeping it
in Access, then creating a query to export the table(s)/fields exactly as
required.
Huw
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: A database question
|
| (...) But writing a function is MUCH more flexible than the built-in export facility. PLUS you can write it such that you do not have to do anything but press a button to get this file generated, MUCH nicer, IMHO (or perhaps I'm just biased because (...) (26 years ago, 7-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A database question
|
| (...) If you go with Access, take the time to write a VBA function to export the data to CSV format. That way, you can share with everyone, and you won't have a export-headache each time you update the database. (...) The classic relational database (...) (26 years ago, 25-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|