|
|
| suggest (score: 0.167) |
|
|
| suggest (score: 0.167) |
|
| | Re: Skip Filter borked?
|
| (...) Hmm, probably not, but I'm not sure how browsers interpret the "only to the originating server" phrase... A browser -could- (and I would think should) remember that a ".foo.bar" cookie came from "www.foo.bar" if it was going to place (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.166) |
|
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
| (...) While I don't think people should need to justify why they mark anything up or down, I think it would help if people were prepared to give/suggest reasons if someone genuinely is curious why they have been downscored. Otherwise they are likely (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.166) |
|
| | Re: No Comment
|
| (...) No, there wasn't any. (...) Yup! Several people noted that they had accidentally clicked a button and submitted a rating on an article they didn't want to rate (for example something in a .loc group they didn't want to interfere with, or an (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.166) |
|
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
| (...) Article ratings aren't supposed to be feedback. The ratings are supposed to describe to readers approximately how helpful or useful or interesting or fun an article might be to them -- giving them some sense of what to expect. (...) What's (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.166) |
|
|
| suggest (score: 0.166) |
|
|
| suggest (score: 0.166) |
|
| | Re: 8480 Technic Shuttles
|
| Rob- (...) Did I use the word auction? I've sold things in this manner many times before on b-s-t and it's never caused a problem. Ever. I even was careful to word it so that it could not possibly be construed as an auction! I'm surprised anyone (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.166) |
|
|
| suggest (score: 0.166) |
|
| | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) But I don't _want_ to, and to suggest that as an alternative to carrying around a machine-generated password seems a little boneheaded. I don't _want_ to leave myself logged into Lugnet just like I don't _want_ to leave myself logged into (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.166) |
|
| | colors of rating digits
|
| In the traffic report/page "shades of red" currently show how hot the article count is, that is, how recent the 38 posts to off-topic.pun in the last 24 hours actually are. In the list of articles you get when you drill in there, "shades of red" (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.165) |
|
| | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) Yeah, but the point is we ARE right. You're not concerned about it, Todd may not be concerned about it, but the market backs us up. Can you change your password at Amazon.com? BN.com? Any other major online retailer you care to name? How about (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
| |
| suggest (score: 0.165) |
|
| | Re: homepage bringing forth weird results
|
| (...) Oh! So basically, what happened: Click to lugnet - displays lugnet (version A) Click to somehwere else - displays other page Click to lugnet - displays lugnet (version B) Click "Back" twice - displays lugnet (version A) [this sounds like a (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.165) |
|
| | Re: Can we define flogging?
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) quasi-market-related (...) transactions. (...) whatever (...) cash. (...) From a market perspective, these types of posts probably belong in buy-sell-trade. I think it is reasonable to ask in shopping "could (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.164) |
|
|
| suggest (score: 0.164) |
|
|
| suggest (score: 0.164) |
|
|
| suggest (score: 0.164) |
|
|
| suggest (score: 0.164) |
|
| | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) ^^^...^^^ (...) Steve, I'm glad you mentioned that -- because from a "makes sense" point of view, I think it's much harder to explain to voters that the article's score is sum(V,1,n)/(n+1) [n voters] than it is simply to explain that the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| suggest (score: 0.164) |