|
 | | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
| (...) Very true, there's nothing inherent which precudes the use of a more descriptive name, if possible (all things considered). (...) Hrm. Just saying "shop-at-home" is likelye to be misleading for anyone who doesn't know what LEGO Shop At Home (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
mail, service
(score: 0.394)
|
|
| |
|
mail, service
(score: 0.394)
|
|
| |
|
service
(score: 0.392)
|
|
| | Re: Password Reset
|
| (...) Kevin, Have you been helped? I'm sorry, but, only ToddL can reset it. I don't have access to our server. He has not been responding to e-mail. I'll try calling him at work. -Suz (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.391)
|
|
| | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials
|
| (...) I've always equated LSAHS = LEGO Shop At Home Service because of the official name being "Shop At Home Service" as shown on the catalogs that come in themail. (...) Mmm, interesting. What goes in front of .lsah.specials? A (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail, service
(score: 0.391)
|
|
| | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials
|
| (...) I've always thought that a retailer sells directly to Joe Gritz even if they slap on the word "wholesale", the meaning of which has been slightly widened these days. I do not consider CostCo to be strictly a wholesaler. In cases like that, (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail, service
(score: 0.391)
|
|
| | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials
|
| (...) "I been tinkin'" about this a lot tonight and want to get it resolved real quick so Mike has a place to post tomorrow morning... As I understand it, there is a UK S@H service as well as the US S@H service. (At least, if the UK SAHS doesn't (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail, service
(score: 0.391)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.390)
|
|
| | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials
|
| (...) Yes, this was my intent. I was not suggesting a moderated news group. A moderated news group sounds like it is too much work. (...) Yes, I think it should work this way. Except, I suppose the original message would need to be posted to the new (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail, service
(score: 0.390)
|
|
| | I think we stepped in something.
|
| G'day folks, Note 1: I decided to compose this post because of the events of late concerning Jesse Alan Long. If you don't want to read something that will make your head hurt, skip this ;] Note 2: I am not arguing with any actions that have been or (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.390)
|
|
| | Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
| (...) <Snipped Banned Topic> (...) I would not like to see JAL's privileges permanently revoked. His language does not seem to be a repetitive problem as with other people who regularly post. I have to admit that what was posted did violate the TOS (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.390)
|
|
| | It is time to ban JAL.
|
| Hello, I have been reading a lot of the posts from Jesse Alan Long, and paying attention to the arguments going on there since they started. I have posted very rarely in response to him, mainly because I feel it has gone on far too long, as most (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.390)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.389)
|
|
| | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials
|
| (...) Well, give it a shot in .announce (for better or for worse) and see what people think. If nobody complains, and a lot of people are happy about it (and I think most people will be), then it's probably the right formula. So how about--? (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail, service
(score: 0.389)
|
|
| | Older Set info to add
|
| Here is some more set info for Pause! (Todd, some of the prices I have listed here are different from what you have in Pause. I don't know why, so you can use whichever you think should be there.) ---...--- From the 1986 Mail Order Catalog: (NEW) (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
mail, service
(score: 0.389)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.389)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.389)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.387)
|
|
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
| (...) Unfortunately, the design of FTX is somewhat flawed when it comes to standard news and mail readers. Enclosing a URL in angle brackets <...> is a hint to most news/mail readers that a long URL that spans more than one line should be (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.386)
|
|
| | link labels
|
| (...) Have you seen a news/mail reader that actually implements that behavior? I don't believe that behavior is even defined in any RFC, is it??? I've heard about line-joining before, but only with the notation <URL:url> (...) But it was designed to (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.386)
|
