Administrative : Search Results: internet mail service


Administrative / Search Results: internet mail service

Results 341 – 360 of about 2200.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?)
Also sprach Todd Lehman: : The difficult thing is that it's not really possible to define profanity in : any way that people can agree on, especially in purely illustrative contexts : such as Jim Baker's (a.k.a. "Beaker") delicate use of the F-word (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: Todd! Admin and owner
(...) Well I don't know how specific you want but without nameing names I will try. I also assume you want specifics as to what I don't like about the reasoning for banning Matthew not reasoning for not liking Matthew. It is my feeling that there (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
(...) I don't want to misinterpret anyone, so I'll say that IMHO TLC gave us a backhanded compliment. I believe that they are starting to recognize us as a force, but don't wish to directly acknowledge us as of yet, trademark infringements aside. I (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Don't steal things from other web sites
(...) Eric, I should clarify that a bit... Certainly you can post anything you find on the lugnet.com site for discussion purposes, and you can probably post a fair amount of other content you find elsewhere, but it all depends on the nature of the (...) (26 years ago, 6-Feb-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Words…
(...) No fighting, I haven’t even donned my flame-suit! :) I believe that I put it quite eloquently, talking about “creative anagram” usage, and “relevant content.” (...) Hey, I too agree with Tim, but I just wanted to provide context to the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Criticism of LUGNET's homepage (was: Re: newsticker)
(...) Thanks! All better now. I'm surprised that nobody else noticed, or at least that nobody else spoke up about it. IMHO, the ability to add LUGNET/Brickshelf sidebars to Nescape and Mozilla hould be something that is featured on the main LUGNET (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp) !

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) I don't think it's normally illegal, no, although I would be surprised if there weren't at least a few gray or semi-gray areas lurking there vis-a-vis publishing links to unannounced products. Mostly I meant wrong in the sensibilities sense, (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: Random thought of the day
(...) As a matter of interest, how much time does it take you and Todd (and/or whoever) to do the autopilot stuff? From what I can see the biggest regular manual labour is new users, with server and access maintenace the next biggest (including (...) (19 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: Mailing list gateways
(...) I meant, sometimes non-obvious needs exist even when no obvious needs exist. And sometimes when neither obvious nor non-obvious needs can be identified, something can still be worth doing. Most "needs" that people identify with started out as (...) (26 years ago, 21-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: eudora thread bug
(...) Thank you Jeff, for your time in posting this, I was reading my emails, came across your post, and decided to finish reading and go back to it, then follow the instructions. Then I read Todds post (thanks Todd) clicked on the link and ta da!!! (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
(...) are there some measure in place? yes, some. Is it possible to block out crawlers? not really. As long as anyone can point their browser (or newsreader) and connect to LUGNET, without requiring a password, the data there can be harvested. We (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: member packets (continued)
(...) What's really sad to me is that people are so selfish about something as insignificant as this. I don't believe that of those 1000 members, all 1000 are pulling their hair out and stomping around the room with steam coming out of their ears (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: Serious group requests
(...) that, but she thinks its strange the number of heated arguements we have here. Granted, she is biased by the fact that she's married to someone fairly reactionary, so she see's a skewed version of things. However, even if I were a mostly (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Help Needed: Cannot See Pictures in Database
G'day folks, Okay, this is weird. A couple months ago I noticed that I could no longer look at the set pictures in the database. I can see the thumbnails when browsing, but when I go to a specific set I get nothing. I emailed Todd about it a while (...) (24 years ago, 21-May-00, to lugnet.admin.database)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: Porthole alternative
I'm disagreeing with Larry here on some specific points, but I hope it's clear that at root, I agree with his stance on community guidance. It's something we need, even if our process needs refinement... (...) Larry, he was originally being friendly (...) (23 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: Spam alert!
I have been reading many messages lately about email address being pulled out of newsgroups. I have to kick in my two cents here, because this is driving me nuts. Newsgroup email harvesting has been happening since the creation of newsgroups. You (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Defamatory Statements (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?)
(...) Good question. The spirit behind the word "defamatory" in that case is to note that the following should be avoided: slanderous or libelous statements, falsely accusing someone of a crime or offense, falsely assailing the character of another, (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		LUGNET going away?!?
(...) So what HAVE you announced, Suz? This is the first I've heard about any such possibility, and I'm very dismayed by it. To me, LUGNET is the place to discuss LEGO. It's also the only web-based forum I can stand to read and post to – I've tried (...) (19 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
(...) Given what I know of Brad, I don't find it difficult at all. Not in the slightest. Maybe you don't know him that well. Or maybe you're a better judge of people, even with less data to go on, than I am. I don't think Brad really wants his (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

internet
(score: 1.845)

		New World LUG Map demo
Hey all, I've been working on a brand new mapping facility for charting LEGO organizations worldwide. It's for mapping all types of LEGO user groups (LUGs, LTCs, MUGs, etc.) as well as for events (BrickFest, BricksWest, NWBrickCon, LEGO World, etc., (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.org, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general) !!

internet
(score: 1.845)

More: Next Page >>