|
 | | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
| (...) if I missed one. Going forward, it's not necessary to post cancel requests, you can mail them to any admin. It's not really WRONG to post the request, I suppose, but it's a bit cluttering. (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|  
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Posting Policy Changes
|
| (...) What address did you mail? We have been having technical problems with some addresses. if it was actually feedback (at) ... then ya, that may not go anywhere other than the owner. Per this page (URL) it's not really the right place for (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) I thought I was answering what you asked... And what hsould be done NOW? Since you are aware of the problem, just have one of the other admins mail Kevin if need be - since it doesn't matter which admin the official mail comes fron... (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Application for Lugnet Membership
|
| Hi all, More than a month ago I applied for Lugnet membership. It took some time to get the money transfer organized (I'm no paypal member, and other means where simply not acceptable because of the banking fees involved), but Rene of 1000steine.de (...) (20 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Email Postings being swallowed
|
| If my spelling is off, it's because I'm posting through the web interface. :-) The problem of email postings just disappearing into the ether has been around for quite a while. Basically I write a post, mail it in, and get no auth responce. So I (...) (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Bug fixed
|
| Just a short note - while working on something else, I ran into a bug I forgot about. When posting to multiple groups via SMTP, the poster would get multiple copies of the authentication message - one for every group posted to - even though any of (...) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp) !
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Another resignation: I'm stepping down.
|
| (...) Define "active". Does activity require a specific number of posts per day for a particular group? A specific number of views per day? A specific number of e-mail subscriptions? Who is to set the baseline for comparison? This growth, or (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Yes. However the LUGNET server doesn't currently have the capabilty to send (originate) mail, does it? That was how I read what you said before. In that case, if it's true that it can't, what then? (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Email Setups (was: Re: Badgering emails)
|
| (...) I think this issue can be boiled down to: 1. Official LUGNET email messages need to come from "*@lugnet.com" reply-to. Resolution: Each admin sets reply-to in their email client. Timeframe: Immediate. 2. To avoid spamblockers and spoof (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) I'm talking about the general case. We've had several situations in the recent past when mail from admins was not received (and no bounce was returned) which led to difficulty, warnings not received, timeouts not properly started because they (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | message for Larry
|
| Dunno if my e-mails aren't gettung thru--I composed a nicely worded e-mail but bottom line is yes, i can do that if it meets with the approval of those that need to sign off on it. (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| Leonard Hoffman wrote: If Kevin felt he couldn't in good faith (...) re: your last 5 words See, this is what people mean when they say transparency. (1) I have a HUGE post to go public, but i am sitting on it. WHY, cause out of respect i am hoping (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) We love you anyway :) (...) I would disagree with that though. Not to mention the server sends emails all the time - news-by-mail, auth emails, etc? (...) Ah, that's what I thrive on :) Perhaps one of the other admins knows? Can find out? (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Not necessarily. LUGNET does not have this ability, as I understand it. It is possible to construct an email that shows the "from:" as being from a lugnet.com email address, but, again, as I understand it, not to have the email actually be (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Ok - but that doesn't change my point. It's out of YOUR control if Yahoo accepts messages from Larry's server. You'd have no way of knowing if it does or doesn't until you actually are sent one. On the other hand, you KNOW that mail from (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: One comment
|
| (...) What we consider profane differs, I guess. But it's not that big a deal. I just wanted to make sure that no one could say you posted a link to something objectionable without warning about it, that's all. (recall that you asked about that very (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) #1 How would the user know there was a problem? #2 Assuming the user knows there's a problem, how can he possibly fix it if he doesn't control the mail server (or the ISP, or whever the block is occuring)? Asking that HE change his email (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.929)
|
