|
 | | Re: CFD: robotics sub-groups
|
| (...) Good news -- They'd be able to access all of the new groups just as well as they currently access the lego-robotics@crynwr.com mailing list. This is because all lugnet.* newsgroups are subscribeable via e-mail: (URL) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
|
| | Re: posting failure?
|
| (...) You e-mailed the .DAT file to lugnet.cad.dat@lugnet.com then? Veddy veddy odd...it hasn't shown up in the ng, and it doesn't appear in the dead- articles file (the rejects file) on the server. It's as if it never made it to the server. Do you (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.178)
|
|
| | Re: posting failure?
|
| (...) writes: (...) gotten a (...) rather (...) only (...) a (...) the (...) 566 (...) could (...) I'm using IE5b2, but it's never given me a lick of trouble before. I've gone ahead and sent the file, we'll see if it makes it. The rejection message (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.178)
|
|
| | Re: posting failure?
|
| (...) What web browser are you submitting this from? I'll hafta mess around and try to recreate the problem. I think BramL was having the same problem a few weeks ago...but I think that was a Juno e-mail problem. In the meantime, try e-mailing the (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.178)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| (...) Sure. If you will mail them out (assuming you have an easy & efficient way to paste all of the subscribers' e-mail addresses into a message. Otherwise, let's wait until L-CAD is back online). (...) I don't agree here. To me, "users" implies (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.178)
|
|
| | Re: Disappearing name in MS Outlook Express
|
| (...) I've never had a problem getting OE to do what I wanted it to do. I don't use it regularly for news, although I do use it exclusively to handle my customer support e-mail. It may not be ready for prime-time in the sense that it is possible for (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.178)
|
|
| | Re: Disappearing name in MS Outlook Express
|
| On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 00:33:37 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) Well, I think 10 of those at least are mine. Todd was a great help in getting me sorted. It was neither Lugnet, nor OE that was the problem, it was me! I (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Slight change in gateway addressing method
|
| (...) At work I don't have a reply all option. Of course the system is a main frame with in house e-mail software. I think it passes mail off to another system, which acts as a gateway to a Netcom connection. In any case, I don't have the reply all (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36adb6d8.922755@lugnet.com>... (...) I like the lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat, and lugnet.cad.dev heirarchy best. If we ever got to the point where lugnet.cad was getting a hundred post a day, it might make sense to (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| Steve Bliss (blisses@worldnet.att.net) wrote: [...] (...) Yup! [...] (...) L-CAD will just _change_ it's name to "lugnet.cad.parts" or whatever we can decide on. (...) Terry's work will probably be noticed more, but I don't expect the procedure to (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Oops! Stopping a cross-posting thread
|
| (...) If you catch the "mistake" earlier enough, you can go back and cancel the article after you see it appear, then re-post the corrected version. In this case, since someone has already replied, you wouldn't want to go back and cancel it or else (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Oops! Stopping a cross-posting thread
|
| Todd, I think I caused a little faux-pas. I responded to someone's posting in lugnet.general, and since I felt it was something for the FAQ, cross-posted to lugnet.faq. Now anyone who does a respond-all will post a message to both groups, when it (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| (...) Apart from .l-cad being a legacy thing, both CAD and LEGO are there twice in the full expansion of lugnet.cad.l-cad: l u g net . cad . l - cad | | | ||| ||| | ||| LEGO Users Group Network CAD LEGO CAD So maybe it's a little bit redundant. :) (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| Todd Lehman (lehman@javanet.com) wrote: [...] (...) Yeees, I get the point. I was wrong. <grumph> ;-( [...] (...) nn, I think - a rather new version (showed up on one of the university machines approximately half a year ago). Play well, Jacob (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| (...) Good, but I would prefer a slightly higher treshold to enter the LEGO CAD developer discussions. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: Jacob.Sparre.Andersen@risoe.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LEGO: MOC+++c TO+++(6543) TC+++(8880) (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| (...) I would say "muddied up". (...) TLG and their software developers know about the list and participate in a constructive way. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: Jacob.Sparre.Andersen@risoe.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LEGO: (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| (...) [...] (...) I have, but we can just as well wait - and work on the suggestion until then. (...) Todd has got me away from the lugnet.cad.users idea. Lets keep the plain lugnet.cad for the general stuff. I don't like to use the name l-cad for (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.177)
|
