Subject:
|
Re: Slight change in gateway addressing method
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 06:13:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1137 times
|
| |
|
|
lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) wrote:
> Bram Lambrecht <braml@juno.com> writes:
>
> > This is especially true because you have
> > to check the original message to see which newsgroup to send it to if you
> > don't have a Reply to all option.
>
> Whoa -- like, do you mean there are actually e-mail programs out there
> which
> don't have both options? [1] I sure haven't ever seen any -- and it's a
> frightening thought!
At work I don't have a reply all option. Of course the system is a main
frame with in house e-mail software. I think it passes mail off to
another system, which acts as a gateway to a Netcom connection.
In any case, I don't have the reply all option. But this shouldn't
matter, as I'm not supposed to be using that account for non business
reasons. If things work right, I'll get only get the Shop-at-Home news
group there. Everything else will go to home, where I'm using Netscape
4.5.
Gary
GaryLouie@EarthLink.Net
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Slight change in gateway addressing method
|
| (...) If the sender chooses not to delete the recipient's name before sending the message, and if the recipient receives the group to which the message is posted via e-mail rather than via news, then yes, they'll receive the same reply twice. If (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
