|
 | | Still getting cad.dev through e-mail
|
| Todd, Last week, I unsubscribed myself from all the groups in favor of getting them via nntp. The e-mail subscription page indicates that I am not subscribed to any groups now. However, I still seem to be getting lugnet.cad.dev by e-mail. What can I (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
mail
(score: 0.181)
|
|
| | Re: Still getting cad.dev through e-mail
|
| (...) Huh? Arg. Actually, it's routed the other way, but I'm trying to get all new mail sent to my geocities.com address. A while ago I tried to change my L-CAD settings to send to my geocities.com address, but it appears to have not worked. (...) (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.181)
|
|
| | News-by-Mail digests
|
| [Crossposted from lugnet.cad.dev; followups set to lugnet.admin.general] (...) glasnapd@db.erau.edu (Doug Glasnapp) writes: (...) Questions: Are any general-purpose (and free) mailing list services out there anywhere on the net which spool up (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) Do you also usually take the trouble to append the article's 'Message-ID' header to its 'References' or 'In-Reply-To' headers (if available) and paste the result into the 'References' header of your new message in order to preserve the (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) uh, no. :) I guess its more complicated than I thought. (...) Once a day. This has been the time period for every other digest im on. Thank you! -Doug oops, sent it to your email too. (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) This is me. If I do wanna reply to a specific msg, I usually take the trouble to put in the right email and subject in, so I wouldnt care one bit, just as long as there is some sorta digest. Per group digest would be better compared to (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: Robotics sub-groups
|
| (...) Well, I want the resolution that's most beneficial to the individual projects and most enjoyable for participants. Fine resolution is good as long as it lives up to the promise of providing for more focused discussions but bad if it is so fine (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| [whoops, this time the Followup-To field is actually set to lugnet.admin.general; I forgot to do that last time.] (...) OK. People receiving duplicates won't disrupt the ng's any, so if duplicate messages aren't annoying to you, then they're not a (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) That sounds like a reasonably good idea. I think most digest-ers are more read-oriented than write-oriented, so making it slightly harder to reply shouldn't be that big of a deal. I think. Steve (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) Mainly that I all of a sudden got flooded with ANOTHER pile of Emails when this was started up. I don't mind the CONTENT, but I prefer it in Digest form. I get anything I can in Digest form, unless it is something that I NEED realtime. (...) (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) I'd much prefer them on a per-group basis, even if it means some duplicates across several Digests. (...) I know of no client at all that can handle Digests in the way you want. It is up to the Digest owner to modify the Digest output to do (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: "the community"
|
| (...) Why not just: usenet.alt.toys.lego usenet.fr.jeux.lego usenet.rec.toys.lego I hope you will make sure that people are made aware that (usenet.)alt.toys.lego is obsolete. Maybe by preventing people from posting to the group? Play well, Jacob (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
|
| | Re: Dear Administrator
|
| [followups set to lugnet.admin.general] (...) I think this all boils down a few layers of simple good-natured confusion. Long ago (December, I think), when Kurt Eilers and John Neil (friends) signed up together, there was evidence that they may have (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
|
| | Re: THE LAST WORD
|
| (...) Absolutely. I originally set follow-up to .debate because of the potential for controversy or flames. I didn't make it an adminstrative issue becuase I try to give the benefit of the doubt, and suggested it might be in error, and offered a (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
|
| | Re: posting failure?
|
| (...) Getting closer...I have a workaround. I'll have to talk to the authors of the Net::Cmd module to be absolutely certain about the nature of the problem, but I think I see it clearly now. The post() method of Net::NNTP goes like this[1]: sub (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
|
| | Re: posting failure?
|
| (...) Well, this bug is certainly interesting. (Thank you for discovering this, BTW.) I've got the problem narrowed down to a file size limitation of approximately 16.5 KB in an NNTP connection library. I know that it's not a bug somewhere in the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
|
| | Re: posting failure?
|
| (...) Did you post from the web interface or send it in by e-mail? I guess only the web interface sends you a copy of your e-mail, and the news-by-mail gateway only writes you back when there was a problem. Lemme check the server logs... Hmm, the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
|
| | Re: Don't steal things from other web sites
|
| (...) I wonder too. I think it definitely slows the spread of information. Still, I don't believe that the ends don't justify the means; and getting permission first probably only slows things by a very small percentage overall. (...) Then again, (...) (26 years ago, 7-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.179)
|
