Subject:
|
Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Feb 1999 00:29:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
905 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> That sounds like a reasonably good idea. I think most digest-ers are
> more read-oriented than write-oriented, so making it slightly harder to
> reply shouldn't be that big of a deal. I think.
>
> Steve
This is me. If I do wanna reply to a specific msg, I usually take the
trouble to put in the right email and subject in, so I wouldnt care one
bit, just as long as there is some sorta digest.
Per group digest would be better compared to all-in-one, since I get
confused somewhat easily with information-overload.
-Doug
--
+----------------------------------------------------------+
Douglas Glasnapp "Just because you're paranoid, it
doesn't mean they're not out to get you."
ICQ: 5143696 http://erau.db.erau.edu/~glasnapd/
+----------------------------------------------------------+
Lego Code: MOC+++,CA++ #+++++ S+ LS+ Hal M+ A YB78m
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) Do you also usually take the trouble to append the article's 'Message-ID' header to its 'References' or 'In-Reply-To' headers (if available) and paste the result into the 'References' header of your new message in order to preserve the (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) That sounds like a reasonably good idea. I think most digest-ers are more read-oriented than write-oriented, so making it slightly harder to reply shouldn't be that big of a deal. I think. Steve (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
