Subject:
|
Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Feb 1999 03:42:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
900 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, glasnapd@db.erau.edu (Doug Glasnapp) writes:
> Steve Bliss wrote:
> > That sounds like a reasonably good idea. I think most digest-ers are
> > more read-oriented than write-oriented, so making it slightly harder to
> > reply shouldn't be that big of a deal. I think.
>
> This is me. If I do wanna reply to a specific msg, I usually take the
> trouble to put in the right email and subject in,
Do you also usually take the trouble to append the article's 'Message-ID'
header to its 'References' or 'In-Reply-To' headers (if available) and paste
the result into the 'References' header of your new message in order to
preserve the threading data?
> so I wouldnt care one bit, just as long as there is some sorta digest.
>
> Per group digest would be better compared to all-in-one, since I get
> confused somewhat easily with information-overload.
How frequently would you want to receive lugnet.cad.dev by mail if you did
receive it as a digest?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) uh, no. :) I guess its more complicated than I thought. (...) Once a day. This has been the time period for every other digest im on. Thank you! -Doug oops, sent it to your email too. (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| (...) This is me. If I do wanna reply to a specific msg, I usually take the trouble to put in the right email and subject in, so I wouldnt care one bit, just as long as there is some sorta digest. Per group digest would be better compared to (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
