|
| |
|  
service
(score: 0.297)
|
|
 | | Re: Question about requests
|
| (...) thanks! (...) People can make their requests/recommendations by posting here, or by sending e-mail to me at suz@lugnet.com. Either is fine. (...) I'll begin activating privilages for some people today. -Suz (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.curators)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.297)
|
|
| | Re: Question about requests
|
| (...) Requesting here seems to have become the defacto method. I'd assume Todd or Suz would let us know if they prefered a different mechanism (I had originally responded by e-mail, but I think it's good to see who is requesting what). (...) Frank (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.curators)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.297)
|
|
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
| (...) It wouldn't work. It would get blocked. (...) Actually there are lots and lots of them, and there have been since 1994, but they tend not to stay up for very long, or have access restrictions, or aren't very flexible. (...) I get bcc'd on (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.297)
|
|
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
| (...) Hm, I got it. In fact the following proposal, assuming there is a curator named for the admin.db group so they can edit FTX, requires NO programming or changes within LUGNET at all! - Set up a hotmail (yahoo, or whatever... a peeron account (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.297)
|
|
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
| (...) either way works for me. I just like the fact that it's viewable by all, so people can see what info was submitted - maybe help avoid double postings. If someone wants to flood the newsgroup, they can now just as easily... And if we want it by (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
| (...) Could do... I don't think the remailer is set up that way currently though. Why don't you hack around with a form that uses it and see if you can autopost to lugnet.test by mailing to the news gateway or something? What Todd did for me is just (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: Pulled off a snipe.
|
| (...) Yah, I suppose pretty much anything you post anywhere on the internet that's viewable without a password has lost its confidentiality. Not sure what he meant by proprietary and "confidential" but what he posted certainly wasn't confidential (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: A Confession and an Apology
|
| (...) <snipped my daughter's sitch> I got a note offline from a well known RTLer who chooses to remain publicly anonymous for privacy reasons, and therefore has chosen not to post here. This person is willing to reveal identity to administrative (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| |
|
service
(score: 0.295)
|
|
| | Re: E-mail authentication during posting
|
| (...) solution (...) I think that the current solution works fine, I was just thinking of how to make it even better. I often use pine for email (mostly at work), so I wouldn't want to do away with the current email that is sent. Can't email be sent (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.295)
|
|
| | Re: E-mail authentication during posting
|
| What if the email message that was sent contained HTML, so rather than having to reply or go to an URL, those of us with HTML capable email clients could just click a submit button? The email could have the same choices the confirmation page has. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.295)
|
|
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
| (...) I've used both the e-mail and the web URL to confirm my posts. In both cases it has worked flawlessly. I'm very glad to be rid of the MadHatter and his antics. This small inconvenience is well worth the benefits. John Hansen (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.295)
|
|
| | Re: Newest Members
|
| (...) Hi, I apologize for the lack of communication and delays in processing. Todd did in fact take a little time off and I'm filling in. In future, please feel free to mail me at suz@lugnet.com to get my direct attention. -Suz (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.295)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.295)
|
|
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
| (...) I really liked the PGP option, but that never seemed to go anywhere. Allowing e-mail replies helped a lot - though it wouldn't be hard to cook something up with Procmail and Perl to get around it. Sooner or later, someone will probably do (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.295)
|
|
| | Idea: New Rating System
|
| I already dropped this idea in an earlier post. Although it was highly rated nobody responded, so I thought I'd put it out here in a separate thread and not buried in the midst of my feelings about the current rating system. The idea in question is (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.295)
|
|
| | ng idea: Sightings
|
| Could there, should there be a group for people reporting mention of LEGO in the media or in the middle of non-LEGO internet stuff? That kind of stuff is always interesting, whether it's LEGO rating a column on the front of WSJ[1] or discussion of (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.295)
|
|
| | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) It *IS* tipped towards us. LD can serve us the most by reading the best suggestions in lugnet.lego.direct. We serve ourselves by making it easier for LD to spot the good suggestions from the fluff. (...) I wouldn't be suprised if marketing (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.294)
|
|
| | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) Except that we know that they want certain information - like what pieces are most popular, because they are starting up a bulk-ordering service. (...) A Pirates part pack would be a very good idea, but as lugnet.lego.direct *isn't* talking (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.294)
|
