Subject:
|
Re: Database Piece Count
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Jul 2001 04:08:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
346 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:55:47AM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > ahhh... a reason like the if you just mailed it to the group, someone
> > would have to auth the message? :) though that might be a good thing,
> > if we allow people to put in just any email as the "from", we'd want to
> > make sure that it's a valid one...
>
> Which is why I am thinking, let it be mailed to some lucky DB admin for
> review... (do you guys take turns watching, or is it whoever gets to fix it
> first, or what?) rather than posting it. That completely reuses the
> componentry that exists now.
either way works for me. I just like the fact that it's viewable by
all, so people can see what info was submitted - maybe help avoid double
postings. If someone wants to flood the newsgroup, they can now just as
easily... And if we want it by mail, well, that's why you can subscribe
:)
as for taking turns? no, nothing that formal. It's first come first
serve :) whoever happens to get to a post first does it.
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Database Piece Count
|
| (...) Well how do you prevent person A looking, fixing, person B looking, realising it's fixed, person C looking, realising it's fixed, etc? Probably not a big deal if there aren't TOO many people helping out. (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | Re: Database Piece Count
|
| (...) I agree, and more importantly, it gives things a higher probability of being double-checked, since everything is more visible, which is one of the reasons this newsgroup exists. A real ticket system with groupware stuff would be much better, (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
| (...) Which is why I am thinking, let it be mailed to some lucky DB admin for review... (do you guys take turns watching, or is it whoever gets to fix it first, or what?) rather than posting it. That completely reuses the componentry that exists (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
