Subject:
|
Re: Database Piece Count
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Jul 2001 03:32:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
445 times
|
| |
| |
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:28:12AM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> A waste of *computing* resources yes. But not a waste of development
> resources, because it's already done. (reuse what exists before embarking on
> development of new, unless there is some huge reason not to reuse (1) )
ahhh... a reason like the if you just mailed it to the group, someone
would have to auth the message? :) though that might be a good thing,
if we allow people to put in just any email as the "from", we'd want to
make sure that it's a valid one...
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Database Piece Count
|
| (...) Which is why I am thinking, let it be mailed to some lucky DB admin for review... (do you guys take turns watching, or is it whoever gets to fix it first, or what?) rather than posting it. That completely reuses the componentry that exists (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
| (...) A waste of *computing* resources yes. But not a waste of development resources, because it's already done. (reuse what exists before embarking on development of new, unless there is some huge reason not to reuse (1) ) Note that the current (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|