To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: racial minifig
 Results 61 – 80 of about 17000.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Panaka is yellow?
 
I'm sure the topic of race amongst mini-figures is an ancient one, but I just wanted to hear theories from the more informed AFOL's this time. I'm pretty sure TLG just wanted to circumvent any racial issues by making ALL the heads "yellow." There've (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 

racial
(score: 1.672)

  Re: Panaka is yellow?
 
(...) All human LEGOfolk are yellow, including Asians and Native Americans. Why should LEGOfolk of African descent be any different? Was there a fuss when the Islanders showed up, and they were yellow? I'm not entirely sure what racial group they're (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 

racial
(score: 1.672)

  Re: Panaka is yellow?
 
(...) I think you're right- that is a reasonable assumption to make. I don't think that's what Lego intended, however. All the Naboo Guards wear the same uniform, and Panaka is the most clearly photographed of the guards in the movie. The stills of (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 

racial
(score: 1.672)

  Re: Panaka is yellow?
 
(...) I really think that what you have written hear gets to the root of the problem. For one I agree with you that it would be nice to get some sort of offical stance from LEGO regarding the issue but beyond that I think there are some very (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 

racial
(score: 1.672)

  Re: Future Wild West Possibilities
 
(...) Don't forget to anger the south, the slaves there were posetions. (SP?) Slavery and the ultimate freeing of the slaves were just minor downfalls of the south. I encourage anyone who doesn't support the lego/Civil war issue because of racial (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.western)
 

racial
(score: 1.670)

  Re: Future Wild West Possibilities
 
(...) Who's to say they would need slaves? The Civil War was more than slavery, the could just concentrate on the battles and not the causes. (soap box mode et drifting off topic) The war was fought over the opression of the North on the South, (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.western)
 

racial
(score: 1.670)

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) Good isn't objective. What we, society as a whole, consider to be "good" is both up for debate in certain areas (I'm specifically _not_ going to mention ab*rti*n here), and it is no more valid than the ideas of other societies, other than (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.670)

  Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
 
(...) Yeah, they were sort of girlie-girl. (...) That doesn't make them *look* better. Those faces are just weird. I think they're getting better, but they have a blank, staring quality. Oh, well. They're head-and-shoulders above Playmobil. In both (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
 

racial
(score: 1.667)

  Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
 
(...) So what about that part which says "minority admissions procedures that can withstand allegations of unfair preferences"? Sounds to me like they're vying for a more fair environment, not necessarily within the restrictions of affirmitave (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.665)

  Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?
 
Ugh...too much work and not enough Lugnet makes Pete a dull boy. I'm actually enjoying this discussion so forgive me if it appears we're flogging a dead horse. (...) So to draw a longish bow do you believe we should expose kids to absolutely (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.664)

  Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
 
(...) Agreed. I expect Libertopia to be a GREAT place to start a commune, for example. No pesky laws about how many unmarried people can live in the same place to get in the way (although you may have to find a property not already encumbered with (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.664)

  Re: *Native* (was "Re: Future Wild West Possibilities")
 
Hi, (...) **Note the small "n"--more on that later. (...) Yeah, but even American Indian is a name not given by the people themselves. Why not simply call Ojibwe Ojibwe, Oneida Oneida, and Cherokee Cherokee? Sure, it blows all of our (note that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.655)

  Re: Wench as a word
 
(...) According to the strict definition of the word, Nazi is very appropriate for the Clintons and liberals of their bent. It involves a totalitarian control of industry and the economy, and is similar to Fascism - both of which (Nazi and Fascist) (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.655)

  Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
 
(...) Larry, The only links you gave in the "Wench" discussion were for the "Nazi" law and the campus orientation. I read the Godwin? Law re: the longer the thread the probablity of Nazi/Hilter =1. The campus orientation article didn't bother me (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.655)

  Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
 
(...) Ask 100 people and you'll get 100 different answers. I don't think you can boil it down to one convenient factor. (...) Civil liberties, racial equality, gun control, abortion, school prayer, censorship, business rights, unions, and on and on. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.653)

  Re: Yet Another Episode 1 Question
 
(...) Whoa there... Here's my take, not like anyone cares... :-) No one has a right not to be offended. If someone chooses to use language that is bigoted or demonstrates prejudice, as long as that person is not advocating the initiation of force, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.651)

  Re: Yet Another Episode 1 Question
 
(...) As a Hungarian of gypsy ancestory, I didn't know that's where that term comes from, how cool - my very own racial slur! I must remember to be offended each time it's used by others, while using it myself among other Hungarians. Also, I must (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.650)

  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) Aye, you both make good points. But the thing about this is that it's not Legoland, it's Star Wars land. This is the first time (I believe) that Lego has tackled something like this. They're making Lego figs of REAL people. I think that they (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.648)

  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) But what you're not incorporating into this assertion is the fact that, at least on some level, the development of the characters was influenced by the actors themselves. Luke's run-in with the Wampa (sp?) was dictated by an accident suffered (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.647)

  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) I got to thinking about what you said... so I went back and watched the Star Wars videos and you know what? Neither Han Solo, Luke Skywalker, nor Qui Gon Jinn were yellow. Papa Skywalker isn't gray. Whattaya know. I know! They could make Lando (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

racial
(score: 1.647)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR