LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 3581 – 3600 of about 16000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: "Banned" word/phrase list for 2002
(...) Agreed, but "color" being the default, isn't it redundant except to the excessively pedantic? (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: First Third Party product for the LEGO(r) Trains market?
(...) And now we come full circle. Long time readers of this group will recall that I've opined against cleaning track at all in the past. :-) What delicious confusion. (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: First Third Party product for the LEGO(r) Trains market?
(...) Good point. But see Todd's post after yours. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. If it does, does that change your answer? (...) I don't need my track cleaned for 21 hours straight, though. I just need it cleaned. MichLTC layouts have been (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: LUCNY Finger Lakes Train show pics
(...) Nice work! Thanks for sharing! " Spatula City! We sell Spatulas... and that's all! " Too funny. Also why are the cement trucks dumping cement on the beach? I don't recall a trailer park in a layout before, nice touch! Can you post a .tdl or (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.org.us.lucny)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
(...) OK, so you favor requireing a drivers license or something else more stringent then? Or restricting it to just LUGNET members only? or what? And you're OK if you go to 0 votes if any two of these are discovered to be the same when probed? What (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
(...) Just to get people thinking, since maybe we're stuck... try this strawman To be an ldraw.org member, you have to supply 3 things, all of which are retained in a DB for validation (but not made public) 1. your real name 2. a working email (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
(...) OK, would that be sufficient? Only LUGNET(tm) members can be members? Is that too exclusionary? It's certainly simple enough. If it IS too exclusionary, what scheme would you suggest for those potential members who are not LUGNET members? (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
(...) Why not? ldraw.org would presumably be (by Bylaws provision) banned from selling the info, and would presumably be bound to take all reasonable care with the information. Those restrictions (which would take a lot of work to ever change, by (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: drawbridge
(...) or did you work from memory or? Did you have any challenges in keeping the two motors sychronized? That's been a bugaboo for others, that one side or the other raises a bit too fast and skews things. I think this is my fave shot: (URL) thanks (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: First Third Party product for the LEGO(r) Trains market?
Zonker still can't post but is reading the thread with interest... he sent me this (reproduced in it's entiriety) and asked me to post it. ___...___ As a follow-up to my first posting (and hoping to answer a few questions raised by other posters), (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
(...) OK, your feelings are noted, at least by me, but I do think we haven't gotten all the possibilities developed yet. I tend to personally favor not working TOO hard to antispoof, but I'll stand by what I said, you may be inadvertantly stifling (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
(...) In a scenario where multiple mechanisms are on offer, you yourself might not ever need to use it, as you'd have several other paths available. But more importantly, until we've a consensus on what level of validation is appropriate, I'd rather (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		"Banned" word/phrase list for 2002
Lake Superior State College has released their annual list of words and phrases they feel ought to be banished. (URL) are selected by them (in an annual tradition dating back to the mid 70's) based on nominations by the general public. LSSC is in (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: First Third Party product for the LEGO(r) Trains market?
(...) "you" in this context being Centerline(tm) (1), not Zonker (or any of the posters to this thread). What is most significant about this is that Centerline decided to offer this, not (believe it or not) whether it actually works or is a good (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: First Third Party product for the LEGO(r) Trains market?
(...) That would be my expectation too. Unless the pad is fuzzy enough to get at the sides a bit? Or the fluid picked up by successive flanges works its way down to the edges? The original report says they saw an improvement in performance. Maybe (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		First Third Party product for the LEGO(r) Trains market?
Pretty exciting news! This is posted on behalf of BayLTC's David (Zonker) Harris, with his permission (and request to so post), who related the following to me: - - - - My home machine has lost the cookie to post to LUGNET, and Todd's on a bus to (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org) !

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Physical Spam
Dunno if this is a true story or not but it's interesting reading. (URL) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Re: LPub install trouble
(...) I'm just guessing here but didn't MegaPOV previously have a dependency on POV 3.1 and didn't work right with 3.5? I dunno because I don't use it. (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		New poster by Larry Pieniazek/MTW
Hi all, I am proud to announce a new poster with some fine models by Larry Pieniazek. Please point your browser at (URL) and click the MOC poster item. De groeten, Jeroen (21 years ago, 14-Aug-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.announce) !!

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

		Some good news for a change, maybe?
(URL) us keep our fingers crossed that something comes of one or two of these pipe dream hobby projects... (note that the header of .space has a link to Scaled Composites website with their press release. As I said in .space, if anyone can win the X (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.282)

More: Next Page >>