LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 1 – 20 of about 16000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Lavender Brick Society
(...) Please review the rules against baiting, Terry. This sort of tone is not appropriate, even in off-topic.debate The admins are going to be taking a jaundiced view of inflammatory posts, of whatever stripe, on this topic. or others. Larry (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		(canceled)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Setting FUT appropriately (was Re: Ministry Of Information Retrieval
(...) .geek isn't an appropriate FUT in my view(1) and I would appreciate it, should there be someone that needs to comment further, that it either stay where it was, or go to the appropriate admin group if the issue seems to need that level of (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: Update please
(...) We appreciate your concern and that of the other LUGNET members who have spotlighted your post. Your desire is understandable, your honesty in bringing this up for attention is appreciated, and your tactfulness in the way you bring it up is (...) (19 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: Custom Space: Obsidian Stealth Strike Craft for sale - The Brickee Mart
Notice that I've put my Admin identity on for just this post. When I am done, I'll go back to being a real person with real opinions, but not in this post. (...) OK, let's take it down a notch please. While this conversation has had some strong (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Profanity and bowdlerization
The LUGNET admins have talked about this topic and reached the following consensus. We're inclined to go with a strict interpretation of the ToS. The ToS was put in place in order to give LUGNET a certain flavor, and we'd like to retain that flavor. (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: My Timeout
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess wrote: (snip) A couple of points: the text Duane posted in the top of this thread was originally sent to me and I shared it with the rest of the admin team. There is a lot of good, thought provoking material in (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: Review Committee chartered for the LUGNET Policies and Procedures document
(...) Jan-Albert van Ree - NL (...) A Policies and Procedures document has been drafted by the LUGNET (note the capitalization) Admin Team, as we said we would in the post I referenced. It has been given to the Review Committee that we chartered. (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
Some snippage. (...) I agree with Peter, I think excessive crossposting is something to be avoided. And I'm not the only person that feels that way. I'd also remind those thinking of crossposting excessively (for shock, for humor, to make a point, (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Review Committee chartered for the LUGNET Policies and Procedures document
As mentioned (URL) here>, the LUGNET administration team has been working on a Policies and Procedures document (sometimes called the P&P for short) that will help clarify to everyone what the various roles and responsibilities related to LUGNET (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: posting privileges to 1000steine-members revoked!?
(...) I can see how there might be some confusion about this. Remember we do not censor posts. Nor do we control who can or cannot highlight (evince the fact that your post that I am replying to seems to have, at a time that people say they want (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: Help with member profile / password
(...) This is not a new concern. In fact, if you read back issues of this very discussion group, you'll find me (4 years ago or whatever it was) railing bitterly against how restrictive the password rules are. (...) That's not making me feel really (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: Password help Please!
(...) You need to get hold of Todd, as currently he is the only one that can reset your password for you. At some point, we hope soon, other people (such as Frand and myself) will be able to do this as well. I have a suspicion that you may have (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: Password help Please!
(...) Here's my understanding: The interim fix of allowing more admins to do it doesn't require any code changes, just permissions changes (who can access certain screens). It's not prudent to undertake code changes with a server move pending. Once (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: Please Post Your Favorite German Words To off-topic.fun
(...) I agree. The original poster should have at LEAST set the FUT correctly, in my view. I'm surprised(1) that so many old hands just followed along and didn't change the FUT either. It's kinda late now but maybe any additional followups might go (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jun-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains, lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.events.1000steine-land, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: i decided to
(...) This is, in my considered opinion, off topic for the off-topic.debate newsgroup as it has to do with the norms and standards of LUGNET itself. If you have an issue with the approach Tim, or anyone else, uses to try to improve things on (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
In lugnet.general, Josh Wedin wrote: (snip) .general is not an appropriate place for this discussion. Josh please see: (URL) (among others) and please respect the FUT. If you have issues with why .general is not a good place, let's talk about them (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.color)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: American Idolatry
(...) No. Your search does not demonstrate that it is necessarily OK or not OK, it merely unearthed incidents of use. The only conclusion to draw there is that the admins chose not to take action for whatever reason, not that using it is necessarily (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: American Idolatry
(...) See (URL) this> post. Please respond to it there (rather than here) if there are further questions or concerns. Hope that helps. (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

		Re: new LUG in San Diego
(...) Please don't do this on LUGNET. If you have reason to believe that your post wasn't seen try dropping an email to anyone, or everyone, on the transition team. Bumping for the sake of "relisting" isn't a good approach, your post isn't lost, it (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)

pieniazek
(score: 1.061)

More: Next Page >>