To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: pieniazek
 Results 2681 – 2700 of about 16000.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Curatorship for lugnet.org.it.itlug
 
(...) Valid point. However email ought to be used as well, perhaps with a pointer to the post, we don't necessarily see things asap. (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.admin.curators)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Missing the point about labor
 
NR showing protectionist stripes? (URL) Krikorian may be right that access to cheap labor means less labor saving innovation, but (apparently not being a free trader) he misses the point. Employers should have the choice of whether to use cheap (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: Are you being secured? (or ...TSA? no: TIA! )
 
From today's USA Today (URL) actual printed version of the story (at least in the ATL market) had a picture of a Brazilian immigration official subjecting a US visitor to the same indignities we apparently are submitting visitors from Brazil to... (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: Curatorship for lugnet.org.it.itlug
 
(...) Followed up offline. You can mail Frank and myself these requests. There is no need to post these here unless you think it might be a controversial request and you seek consensus, or unless we seem to have missed your request. Please always (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.admin.curators)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: scan time....
 
(...) The above post reminded me of this strip (URL) (last panel) Unfortunately I had to wait till today to post it since it's today's strip. Strikes me that deciding something is bad because a lot of other people like it is just as messed up as (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Are you being secured? (or ...TSA? no: TIA! )
 
The Transportation Security Adminstration may be misnamed... there's an "in" missing, as in "INsecurity" (URL) there's a great article in the Feb issue of Reason as well. (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: Water wheel construction
 
(...) I'm curious, did you try rotating the fencing 22.5 degrees relative to the 8 clips so that each fence would be held on by 2 clips and all 8 would be used? Or does that not work, even if you skew the clips slightly? I want to see someone do an (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.castle)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: New newsgroup for Bricklords?
 
(...) In my view, to split a group there has to be a natural compartmentalization and a strong likelyhood that topics won't wander back and forth a lot, defeating the categorization. Trains.org got split out already (and threads there nevertheless (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.gaming)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: New newsgroup for Bricklords?
 
(...) No! I don't think Frank meant it like that at all. But when traffic in an existing group gets to a certain level and it looks like it might be sustained, not just a flash in a pan, and it subcategorizes logically, it's certainly a valid thing (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.gaming)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Interesting article on Wal-Mart
 
Here's an interesting article from Fast Company (URL) actually found the link on an EDI mailing list I'm on (Wal-Mart requires all suppliers to use EDI in trading with it, good for us since we're pretty strong in EDI, but not necessarily great for (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: LPub/LSynth/Mega-POV Question
 
(...) Synthesised wire and tubing, if I recall correctly, is achieved by placing a large number of "primitive" elements along the spline that defines the centerline of the desired shape, aligned so they are tangential to the spline at that point, (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: December MOTM/SOTM Winners, January Voting Open
 
(...) Er... No soup for you, Dave! At least not the way it's currently implemented, I don't think. Why wouldn't you want to be able to vote, though? Do your civic duty, Dave! More seriously, sounds like a good suggestion, maybe Orion can fix it. (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: Suggestion for a New Year's Resolution
 
(...) Good suggestion, but I have one for Kevin B as well... Implement the reverse direction! If you are trolling around on BS via the recent gallery entry path, and you find a nifty gallery by "blarg" there currently is not an easy way to just scan (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: December MOTM/SOTM Winners, January Voting Open
 
(...) It is necessary to have a logon to the website in order to vote using the website functionality, which has been the mechanism in place since the contest was relaunched on the new site, which supports user logon and requires it for access to (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) I think you really are on to something now... The various instruction creator/authors all have their own styles, although some authors are similar in some areas to some other authors, you still can often tell who did which instructions if (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Steering Committee results
 
All: The winners of the LDraw Steering Committee Election are (in alphabetical order by last name): Kevin L. Clague Tim Courtney* Chris Dee Larry Pieniazek Orion Pobursky A total of 86 votes were cast. I did not cast a vote in this election. (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce, lugnet.org) !! 
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) Hey, there's a nifty idea. Further, the FoTM (if structured to encourage explanation of techniques and so forth in the writeup) could end up being awarded to a file that didn't necssarily make a spectacular display but that did demonstrate (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) That's unjustified (as in, you haven't justified that view, merely stated it) and dismissive and not really a good attitude to take, in my view. (...) um, 6 out of 17 (see (URL) ) isn't really "mostly". It might be a plurality but it's way (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) Precisely my point, and precisely why putting them on an uneven footing will diminsh (the number of) entries. Better to have a level playing field, one way or the other, and better to set that field to maximise the number of entries. (...) All (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

  Re: Didja Notice??
 
(...) I'm confused here by the referents in your sentence. I thought the canopy/nose from the TT set was the metroliner canopy/nose but in grey (it was also used in white in an aquazone set)... the fireboat canopy/windshield looks to me like the one (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR