LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 1741 – 1760 of about 16000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
(...) I'm beside myself with disappointment on that one. (...) There have been repeated proposals for the formation of a group, "lugnet.parts". That group hasn't been formed yet. It certainly seems like it would be the place for that topic (and many (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.color)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Bad news for NASA
There is some confusion in my mind about whether this topic belongs in .general or .nntp... read the charter for general and it's on topic there. Plus that's where every other admin post is. So FUT to both I guess. (...) Whether it was already a (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Bad news for NASA
This is a reply to both Kelly and Steve (close by in the tree) and the FUT is set to just admin.general (...) I don't know what's proper. We're experimenting. I hope people won't get too upset about it, till we get it right. I did an experiment (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Big 2 willing to help with ballot access?
(...) What do I expect, you ask? Same old same old, I guess. Not that the malignancy is confined to the GOP, mind you. But doesn't mean I can't complain/be peeved/be disappointed.. (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Bad news for NASA
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Kelly McKiernan wrote: (snip) I have forceFUTed your post (and am considering others in the tree as well) to .debate as it's veering in that direction (discussions of the merits of funding are probably not nearly as well (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Big 2 willing to help with ballot access?
It was reported in the local press that Ralph Nader is getting some aid in his quest to get on the MI ballot from an (at first glance) unexpected quarter. (URL) GOP! yes, as long as the big two think a third party or independent candidate can, by (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Liberarian presidential candidate stance on Marriage Amendment defeat
Reproduced without explicit permission, but hey, it's a press release, that's the idea. ===...=== NEWS FROM THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY 2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, Suite 100 Washington DC 20037 World Wide Web: (URL) release: July 15, 2004 ===...=== For (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Profanity Question (was Re: American Idolatry)
(...) It's not censorious, it's a condition of usage. No censorship is involved. (...) My personal preference is no. An administrative answer is, stay tuned. Personal preference again: Hold off till the answer comes down. (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) Write Frank, Tim, Todd or myself if you need a cancel. Else, what are you talking about? (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
(...) Do we have any of those here? (biblical scholars who know what they're talking about, I mean, I wasn't casting aspersions on everyone as far as knowing what they're talking about, mind you...) If we don't do we have to take your word for it on (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: American Idolatry
(...) I'm thinking it doesn't. At least not the first one. The second one maybe. But that's a topic for somewhere in the .admin hierarchy, and I just gave you my personal opinion not an official pronouncement... I'll look into it and get back to you (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) You know what, in my crazier moments I'd be happy to leave the definition of "marriage" to whatever non governmental sanctioning bodies wanted to sanction it, and they can define it however they like. As part of that leaving I'd then go (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: American Idolatry
(...) Because it's a freedom of speech issue. Same as I support the right of the KKK to march, wear silly sheets, and say mean things(1), while choosing not to actually march, sheetify, or mean-emit with them. Some constitutional scholar you are! (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: [Followup:] Reserve your BrickFest commemorative container on-line, NOW!
(...) MichLUG is the parent club of MichLTC. But unlike Robin and the GFLUG/GFLTC situation, we actually ARE offering two containers and seeking two in exchange. Why? Because we often find we are doing more than one show at once, often at opposite (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.events.brickfest)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
(...) I don't think it does either. At least not completely, because the market isn't a shifting one (at least not at the like LEGO/don't like LEGO level) I'm just drawing the analogy to the very first people in that model that take something up (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Not the right way to exit?
(...) Yes. As has been repeatedly been pointed out, by myself and others, going back to the very beginning of this newsgroup, we're a major causative factor, if not the primary reason, for Iraq's recent troubles. Some blame lays at the feet of the (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
(...) It would help if I realised Chris was talking about BrickShelf instead of BrickLink. I still think the point stands though... not all users are current users and not all users are serious AFOLs, it's (somewhat more?/about as/nearly as?) likely (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
Just picking at a few numbers, don't disagree with the main thrust but accuracy matters. (...) That's a "Have been since it started" number. Not all members are current. Also, not all members are serious. Many have a single feedback or none. This (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: BrickFest 2004 Announces Dirty Brickster Event
(...) Stickers are fine if you don't trust the players. But unless you have 60 people playing in one game or something, it's not a problem to keep track and stickers are overkill. The person who stole it the third time (who presumably plotted (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.events.brickfest)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

		Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
(...) The big business case, it seems to me, is not our personal volume, but our influence on others by our activities. To pick just one example... How much is a 3 minute spot on a local morning newscast (in Detroit, say), extolling the virtues of (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)

pieniazek
(score: 0.326)

More: Next Page >>