Subject:
|
Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:01:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1500 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
What makes you think the “ten virgins” are “bridesmaids for the bride”?
|
It’s not what I think-- it is what biblical scholars think. So again--
leave the exegesis to the ones who know what they are talking about.
|
Do we have any of those here? (biblical scholars who know what they’re talking
about, I mean, I wasn’t casting aspersions on everyone as far as knowing what
they’re talking about, mind you...)
If we don’t do we have to take your word for it on every biblical interpretation
question? I’m not sure that’s a useful approach necessarily, but the alternative
of requiring cites isn’t as much fun either.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
