Results 1741 1760 of about 16000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| (...) I'm beside myself with disappointment on that one. (...) There have been repeated proposals for the formation of a group, "lugnet.parts". That group hasn't been formed yet. It certainly seems like it would be the place for that topic (and many (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.color)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
| There is some confusion in my mind about whether this topic belongs in .general or .nntp... read the charter for general and it's on topic there. Plus that's where every other admin post is. So FUT to both I guess. (...) Whether it was already a (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
| This is a reply to both Kelly and Steve (close by in the tree) and the FUT is set to just admin.general (...) I don't know what's proper. We're experimenting. I hope people won't get too upset about it, till we get it right. I did an experiment (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Kelly McKiernan wrote: (snip) I have forceFUTed your post (and am considering others in the tree as well) to .debate as it's veering in that direction (discussions of the merits of funding are probably not nearly as well (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Big 2 willing to help with ballot access?
|
| It was reported in the local press that Ralph Nader is getting some aid in his quest to get on the MI ballot from an (at first glance) unexpected quarter. (URL) GOP! yes, as long as the big two think a third party or independent candidate can, by (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) Do we have any of those here? (biblical scholars who know what they're talking about, I mean, I wasn't casting aspersions on everyone as far as knowing what they're talking about, mind you...) If we don't do we have to take your word for it on (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: American Idolatry
|
| (...) I'm thinking it doesn't. At least not the first one. The second one maybe. But that's a topic for somewhere in the .admin hierarchy, and I just gave you my personal opinion not an official pronouncement... I'll look into it and get back to you (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: American Idolatry
|
| (...) Because it's a freedom of speech issue. Same as I support the right of the KKK to march, wear silly sheets, and say mean things(1), while choosing not to actually march, sheetify, or mean-emit with them. Some constitutional scholar you are! (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| (...) I don't think it does either. At least not completely, because the market isn't a shifting one (at least not at the like LEGO/don't like LEGO level) I'm just drawing the analogy to the very first people in that model that take something up (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: Not the right way to exit?
|
| (...) Yes. As has been repeatedly been pointed out, by myself and others, going back to the *very beginning* of this newsgroup, we're a major causative factor, if not the primary reason, for Iraq's recent troubles. Some blame lays at the feet of the (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| (...) It would help if I realised Chris was talking about BrickShelf instead of BrickLink. I still think the point stands though... not all users are current users and not all users are serious AFOLs, it's (somewhat more?/about as/nearly as?) likely (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| Just picking at a few numbers, don't disagree with the main thrust but accuracy matters. (...) That's a "Have been since it started" number. Not all members are current. Also, not all members are serious. Many have a single feedback or none. This (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) |
|
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| (...) The big business case, it seems to me, is not our personal volume, but our influence on others by our activities. To pick just one example... How much is a 3 minute spot on a local morning newscast (in Detroit, say), extolling the virtues of (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.326) | More: Next Page >>
|