|
 | | Re: new newsgroup lugnet.inst
|
| (...) Good question. Ok, why lugnet.build.arch on LUGNET? Why not lugnet.building.architecture? Why comp.arch.storage on USENET? Why not computers.architecture.storage? Well, in choosing newsgroup names, there's a long tradition (going back 20+ (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|  
followup, header
(score: 3.981)
|
|
| | Can't reply to lugnet.general 2963
|
| Just what it says. Via the web interface, I click on the "reply" button, write my note, change the newsgroups, followup-to and subject, and get the following error: 441 defhdrs.awk: no Subject: header! It also generated the same error no matter (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.981)
|
|
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| (...) Ahh, good idea. The URLs for the articles are less stable than the Xref lines are. For example, when the new web-interface/hierarchy is moved into place, shortly after that will come a remapping of all the article URLs (but the old ones will (...) (25 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.981)
|
|
| |
|
outlook, express
(score: 3.981)
|
|
| | Re: 6074: Black Monarch's Castle is a Legend!
|
| (...) Hi Felix, I too don't understand German, but a quick translation of Jojo's followup says something like "then that online toy-shop header was correct after all". Given the correction he makes on the title to 6074, I assume there is a valid (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-02, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.981)
|
|
| | Re: Posting problem with the web-interface!
|
| (...) No. See <URL:(URL) and <URL:(URL) The magic number seems to actually be 998. (...) Yes. From the GNKSA, above: <<Followup agents SHOULD not shorten References headers. If it is absolutely necessary to shorten the header, as a des- perate last (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.980)
|
|
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.980)
|
|
| | Re: weird return after post
|
| (...) Thanks for reporting this. Now for some followup questions: I found your article in the dead.article file here, so I can see at least part of the problem. Here's the header (indented): Newsgroups: toomanyLEGOS? References: (...) (26 years ago, 16-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.980)
|
|
| |
|
outlook, header
(score: 3.979)
|
|
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
| (...) Yes. I'm thinking that the safest & quickest (at runtime) approach will be to embed a special header into the NNTP article stream just as it's being injected by the newsserver (similar to the way the default Followup-To field is automatically (...) (25 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.979)
|
|
| |
|
outlook, header
(score: 3.979)
|
|
| |
|
outlook, header
(score: 3.979)
|
|
| | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
|
| [I'm replying to an email that Stuart Crenshaw wrote. He said it was OK to quote him here and reply for everyone's benefit. I quoted his reply inline below to fit into the thread.] (...) No, you actually can post to lugnet newsgroups via e-mail (not (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.979)
|
|
| | Re: NNTP newsreader
|
| (...) yah, but from when I understand the nntp authentication only allows you access to the server - it doesn't verify that you post as yourself only... (...) we've been through this before... an x header works as long as you never typo it - once (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
outlook, header
(score: 3.978)
|
|
| | CFD: rec.toys.lego feed here
|
| As of today, there have been half a doezn posts to rec.toys.lego already which were crossposted to one or more lugnet.* newsgroups. Of course, those messages will never make it here because this server doesn't carry rec.toys.lego and doesn't (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.978)
|
|
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) An official post requires a certain stationary (aka email address domain) and a particular signature with specific elements in it. Have I understood you correctly? Is this actually documented anywhere? This would seem to suggest that lacking a (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
outlook, header
(score: 3.978)
|
|
| | Re: visit the new populair lego website
|
| (...) Marco - If you would like to post to multiple groups, please include each group you are posting in the header of _one_ message, at the top, separated by commas. Example: lugnet.space,lugnet....net.castle Also, please consider what is on-topic (...) (21 years ago, 30-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.978)
|
|
| | Re: Ebay auction Group
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) is (...) Well, part of the problem may be the way I have it configured. OE caches headers, which in general is REAL NICE, but does mean that it takes some time to get into a newsgroup, even if there are just a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
outlook, header
(score: 3.978)
|
|
| | Re: the whole truth and nothing but the truth
|
| (...) <snip> (I normally *do* intentionally trim to save on download and read time) It sounds like you are talking about trimming content from posts, but J2 was talking about trimming groups from the followup settings so that subsequent posts don't (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jun-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.978)
|
|
| | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) Actually, the code would have to have a few more rules, but I'm sure Dan or Todd could whip something up in minutes. Code basics: If <sender> contains <@lego.com> and <group> is not <.direct>, append header/footer Said header/footer (maybe (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.978)
|
