|
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) Hello, I was the person to verify the 7720 set (and this is my first post on Lugnet). Please, excuse me to not check the whole inventory properly. I have only corrected the most obvious mistakes like the number of wheels. I have overlooked the (...) (18 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.people.newbie)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Re: ???Question???
|
| (...) My understanding is that the ISO Latin 1 8-bit character set reserves those characters (among others) for control codes. I can't actually check, because the standard isn't available online (paper version costs about 56 CHF....). But this is (...) (24 years ago, 20-May-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Re: ng/ml gatewaying
|
| Todd Lehman writes: > In each case, if the 'From' header were left unchanged, then the respective > servers at each end would bounce any messages from the people it didn't > recognize -- which is many in both cases -- and the lists on each side (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Re: some [Q]'s (fwd)
|
| Yoni, (...) Use snapable male header strips. They come in lengths from a few pins to more than 30. They're simply .025 inch square metal pins stuck in a strip of plastic on .1 inch centers | | | | | | They kinda look like this. ===...=== | | | | | | (...) (28 years ago, 23-Oct-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Re: lots of returned messages
|
| (...) It depends on the group. Normally, no... What group did you post to? If it was one of the groups gatewayed with an older mailing list, then if there are any dead/obsolete recipient addresses still on the list that haven't been cleaned out (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.faq)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
| (...) Gesundheit! (...) Dude! All right! (...) In cases like this, it's perfectly OK to correct typos and misuses of trademarks (especially TLG trademarks). That is to say, this question could just as well be re-written as: Subject: What is (...) (25 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Another part review question - about headers
|
| I'm looking at the "Official Library Header" specification ((URL) How strictly must currently unofficial parts conform to the !LDRAW_ORG and !LICENSE lines, for example? Are those set by admins once the content of a part is certified, or as a (...) (16 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
|
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
|
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
| (...) <In best televangelist voice> "Ah cahn see!" To be slightly more informative: That does make a difference. The links are significantly more distinct, regardless of the size of the little box. It also doesn't detract from the impression of the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Save image word for pbForth.
|
| Hello, Being bored uploading all the optional libraries to my pbForth system all the time, Ive reinvented the wheel and implemented SAVE-SYSTEM word. Now I can create many different saved pbForth versions and load them at will. The idea is (...) (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | News-by-Mail digests
|
| [Crossposted from lugnet.cad.dev; followups set to lugnet.admin.general] (...) glasnapd@db.erau.edu (Doug Glasnapp) writes: (...) Questions: Are any general-purpose (and free) mailing list services out there anywhere on the net which spool up (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Rpr's big auction.
|
| Hi, it's been a while, but I'm back :-) Again a new auction by rpr. It took a long time because alot of good stuff went into trades and a lot of other things went on in my life (it's all about priorities :-) This auction contains some left-overs (...) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Re: what's the file format of Lugnet Private Set List??
|
| (...) Peeron uses only the 2nd (ID) and 6th (# sets owned) fields - everything else is ignored, and all fields after the 6th can be empty (or missing). Note that the first 3 lines are also ignored (since that's where the header info in the export is (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.inv)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Re: Unexpected Email Message
|
| (...) Hmm, that's too bad. :-( I thought auto-responders were supposed to look at the X-Precedence header of the SMTP message and not respond if the value was set to 'list' or 'bulk'. --Todd [followups to .off-topic.geek] (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.304) |
|
| | Re: GCC toolchain available for NXT
|
| (...) Hi, I have set up a gcc-based toolchain for the Atmega48 AVR on the NXT brick in addition to my arm-elf toolchain announced earlier. See (URL) for an initial description of setting up avr-gcc and for the initial changes needed in the source (...) (18 years ago, 24-Nov-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.303) |
|
|
| set, header (score: 3.303) |
|
|
| set, header (score: 3.303) |
|
| | Re: MB quality
|
| (...) How many samples do I have to take? It's representative enough for me, since it wasn't my first bad experience.... I've tried MB several times and always have been, in the end, disappointed with the quality. I have limited resources (of time, (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.303) |
|
| | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
| (...) Here's a rough sketch: File A has these headers: Flarn: Gook Cheeseball: Snorkle Include: B Include: C File B has these headers: Flarn: Gobbledegook Slack: Snafu Snarf: Quest File C has these headers: Flarn: Vorlon Snarf: Wormy Queen: Keep (...) (25 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
| |
| set, header (score: 3.303) |