Subject:
|
Another part review question - about headers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:18:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4405 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
I'm looking at the "Official Library Header" specification
(http://www.ldraw.org/Article398.html). How strictly must currently unofficial
parts conform to the !LDRAW_ORG and !LICENSE lines, for example? Are those set
by admins once the content of a part is certified, or as a reviewer am I to
verify this part of the header as well?
Thanks,
Jim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Another part review question - about headers
|
| (...) Hi Jim, the new header was the result/a requirement of/for the CA conversion (Ratified 2006-09-08) but the PT is up since 2001. This means that you'll come across many parts which have been submitted earlier: My oldest is this one (URL) (Aug (...) (16 years ago, 16-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
6 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Another part review question - about headers -Willy Tschager (16-Jun-08 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Another part review question - about headers -Jim DeVona (17-Jun-08 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Another part review question - about headers -Steve Bliss (17-Jun-08 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Another part review question - about headers -Jim DeVona (17-Jun-08 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Another part review question - about headers -Willy Tschager (17-Jun-08 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|