LUGNET News : Search Results: dead legends Beneke


Search Results: dead legends Beneke

Results 1041 – 1060 of about 6600.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) OK, lets make this clear. the ONLY train stuff i own is: a box of MISB switch points a box of MISB STRAIGHT track some yellow/black train mostly still in box THATS IT AND!!!!! the ONLY reason i own all that was to have it in a place in my (...) (19 years ago, 4-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: so...
(...) As long as you are painting over the Fusion paint this is fine. The problem that I've encountered with Fusion is that it picks up color from underlying plastics, paticularly red plastic. I've been making models and movie props for years. If (...) (19 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Robothon Recap - Welcome to SMART
We had a very busy and exciting weekend at Robothon 2005. SMART had two tables where we demonstrated some of our robots and showed a video of our the last Crate Contraption that David, Mark, and I put together. Our table was manned by Brad, David, (...) (19 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.us.smart)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) Actually, I was assuming he wanted to make a cool GBC, and, in an attempt to create a really cool module, he decided to try and put a train to good use. Unlike all the train people that want to add a Mindstorms to their train layout, he wants (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) Well, you could throw 'em my way so I can practice using my Dremel... That's a good use... Dave K (19 years ago, 4-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) I doubt it's a problem with the chip. In order for the DCC to send the signal to the chip, it must send a message pulse that sometimes either goes above 9v, or goes below 9v. The RCX has a maximum output of 9v. So, to send the signal, it must (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) hummmm what chip did you use? this one is rated to 1 amp, and IIRC, the stall is higher. and IIRC, (some more) the stall of the technic is LOWER. we'll see. maybe this is todays project. Chris (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) UMmmm NO!! this is NOT for trains.... heck. i even said in my original post: "so that i dont mess up my (technic) motors. " i think DCC is a nice way to add many motors to a technics creation, and only need once pass through wire. Chris (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
I love the assumption here that Chris... Chris Magno! Is going to use this for trains. :-) Derek (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) Ummm dunno about anyone else, but I certainly didn't make that assumption... ROSCO (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) I'm going to give you an FYI, but if you DCC a 9v motor using the brick you're building, you get a diminished power output to the motor as oppsed to going straight 9 volts to the motor, or (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: Question about the new trains
In lugnet.trains, Rob Hendrix wrote: Hi Rob, additinally to your theory there is another problem with the wheelsets: they are partly moulded wrong, as you easiely can recognise in this picture (2 URLs) Jake has told us long ago this was a mistake by (...) (21 years ago, 6-Aug-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct, FTX)

beneke
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) see, in my little mind, this serves 2 purposes. 1. to see if my THEORY that if i post, LUGNET over all stats to post, and when i stop, LUGNET slows down.... and 2. i dont care about the lights. i was thinking about a SIMPLE 2x4 plate and IN (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
Dave. I am now the proud owner of a DN121ip Digitrax DCC chip. (URL) seeing as your the DCC guy, where should i start. i want to make it into a "brick" the way you did. so that i dont mess up my (technic) motors. where should i start. what do i (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) You can get more outputs or a smaller brick by chopping a wire, and using the 2 bits for signal input and motor output. Only really useful if you know the brick is gonna be close to the signal and motor though. ROSCO (19 years ago, 2-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
(...) You need to get some LEGO electric plates then look thru these helpful instructions-- (URL) there's two ways you can do it--DCC chips have a few options for lights and things. Some of mine came with 4 light outputs but I only used 2 So you (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: lego technic DCC
(...) Chris, This is the exact application that I wrote the DCC enabled pbForth for. Sometimes it seems like I'm flogging a dead horse to get this into the mainstram of LEGO applications for DCC, but it's a heck of a lot easier than dealing with (...) (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.501)

		Re: Just a few highlights and points...
(...) I didn't read it. But if I had... (...) Agreed. although if we start running mazes with loops (like Alegomazer did) I think mapping, physically, the maze will likely be needed - if for no other reason than to know when you've closed a loop. (...) (19 years ago, 28-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc, lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.500)

		[ANN] Re: CaroML development (the end)
After a tentative private contact with Dan Boger, i announce my CaroML project (formerly Peeroml) has come to a dead end. I take this opportunity to apologize: * because i have tentatively stolen other people work * because when told i was not (...) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)

dead
(score: 0.500)

		Re: Just a few highlights and points...
(...) Agreed. Using two rotation sensors could certainly work, but that takes two RCX inputs, leaving me only one light sensor for line following (OK most of the time) and detecting & describing junctions (rather more difficult with a single light (...) (19 years ago, 28-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc, lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.500)

More: Next Page >>